A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures

AI-generated keywords: ChatGPT Failure Reasoning Bias Language Model

AI-generated Key Points

  • The study analyzes the failures of ChatGPT, a language model developed by OpenAI that simulates human conversation by comprehending context and generating appropriate responses.
  • Eleven categories of failures are presented, including reasoning, factual errors, math, coding, and bias.
  • Despite its impressive capabilities in certain tasks, further improvement is necessary for ChatGPT to excel in areas such as reasoning, mathematical problem-solving, reducing bias, etc.
  • It remains susceptible to faults due to the unclear capabilities of current technology.
  • The degree to which ChatGPT memorizes vs. understands what it generates is still unknown.
  • The collection of failures outlined here can serve as a foundation for creating a comprehensive dataset of typical questions to assess future LLM and ChatGPT iterations as well as generate simulated data for model training and evaluating the performance of models.
  • Any language model used publicly must be monitored transparently communicated regularly checked for biases.
  • Utilizing this technology responsibly is crucial for society.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ali Borji

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Large language models have been demonstrated to be valuable in different fields. ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, has been trained using massive amounts of data and simulates human conversation by comprehending context and generating appropriate responses. It has garnered significant attention due to its ability to effectively answer a broad range of human inquiries, with fluent and comprehensive answers surpassing prior public chatbots in both security and usefulness. However, a comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's failures is lacking, which is the focus of this study. Eleven categories of failures, including reasoning, factual errors, math, coding, and bias, are presented and discussed. The risks, limitations, and societal implications of ChatGPT are also highlighted. The goal of this study is to assist researchers and developers in enhancing future language models and chatbots.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Feb. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2302.03494v8

This study focuses on analyzing the failures of ChatGPT, a language model developed by OpenAI that simulates human conversation by comprehending context and generating appropriate responses. While ChatGPT has been demonstrated to be valuable in different fields and surpasses prior public chatbots in both security and usefulness, this study presents eleven categories of failures, including reasoning, factual errors, math, coding, and bias. The risks, limitations, and societal implications of ChatGPT are also highlighted. Despite its impressive capabilities in certain tasks, further improvement is necessary for ChatGPT to excel in areas such as reasoning, mathematical problem-solving, reducing bias, etc. It remains susceptible to these faults due to the unclear capabilities of current technology. The degree to which ChatGPT memorizes vs. understands what it generates is still unknown. Additionally, the extent to which it has commonsense and ways to enhance it are uncertain. While large language models may accurately represent language, it is unclear whether they can fully capture human thought. ChatGPT can be prone to remembering things verbatim and can be quite rigid. It appears limited in its ability to generate creative solutions to novel problems particularly those in mathematics that are still unsolved. The collection of failures outlined here can serve as a foundation for creating a comprehensive dataset of typical questions to assess future LLM and ChatGPT iterations as well as generate simulated data for model training and evaluating the performance of models. However, any language model used publicly must be monitored transparently communicated regularly checked for biases. Finally, while there are opportunities presented by ChatGPT's capabilities in imitating human language generation with adequate safeguards implemented responsibly utilizing this technology is crucial for society. Whether or not it can reach human level intelligence or beat it in a wide array of problems remains uncertain but astonishing how well it works nonetheless.
Created on 24 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.