A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures
AI-generated Key Points
- The study analyzes the failures of ChatGPT, a language model developed by OpenAI that simulates human conversation by comprehending context and generating appropriate responses.
- Eleven categories of failures are presented, including reasoning, factual errors, math, coding, and bias.
- Despite its impressive capabilities in certain tasks, further improvement is necessary for ChatGPT to excel in areas such as reasoning, mathematical problem-solving, reducing bias, etc.
- It remains susceptible to faults due to the unclear capabilities of current technology.
- The degree to which ChatGPT memorizes vs. understands what it generates is still unknown.
- The collection of failures outlined here can serve as a foundation for creating a comprehensive dataset of typical questions to assess future LLM and ChatGPT iterations as well as generate simulated data for model training and evaluating the performance of models.
- Any language model used publicly must be monitored transparently communicated regularly checked for biases.
- Utilizing this technology responsibly is crucial for society.
Authors: Ali Borji
Abstract: Large language models have been demonstrated to be valuable in different fields. ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, has been trained using massive amounts of data and simulates human conversation by comprehending context and generating appropriate responses. It has garnered significant attention due to its ability to effectively answer a broad range of human inquiries, with fluent and comprehensive answers surpassing prior public chatbots in both security and usefulness. However, a comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's failures is lacking, which is the focus of this study. Eleven categories of failures, including reasoning, factual errors, math, coding, and bias, are presented and discussed. The risks, limitations, and societal implications of ChatGPT are also highlighted. The goal of this study is to assist researchers and developers in enhancing future language models and chatbots.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.