A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures
AI-generated Key Points
- Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have proven valuable in various fields
- ChatGPT can simulate human conversation and generate appropriate responses
- ChatGPT's ability to answer a broad range of human inquiries surpasses prior public chatbots in both security and usefulness
- A comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's failures is lacking
- Ten categories of failures exhibited by ChatGPT are presented, including reasoning, factual errors, math, coding, and bias
- The risks, limitations, and societal implications of ChatGPT are highlighted
- LLMs like ChatGPT have limitations and can often generate incorrect information
- Efforts are ongoing to formulate standardized sets of questions to track the progress made by these models over time
- It is necessary for researchers and developers to address these limitations while enhancing future language models and chatbots' development
- This will maximize their potentials while minimizing risks associated with them such as bias or incorrect information generation.
Authors: Ali Borji
Abstract: Large language models have been demonstrated to be valuable in different fields. ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, has been trained using massive amounts of data and simulates human conversation by comprehending context and generating appropriate responses. It has garnered significant attention due to its ability to effectively answer a broad range of human inquiries, with fluent and comprehensive answers surpassing prior public chatbots in both security and usefulness. However, a comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's failures is lacking, which is the focus of this study. Ten categories of failures, including reasoning, factual errors, math, coding, and bias, are presented and discussed. The risks, limitations, and societal implications of ChatGPT are also highlighted. The goal of this study is to assist researchers and developers in enhancing future language models and chatbots.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.