Corporate Culture and Organizational Fragility
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Corporate culture plays a crucial role in facilitating collaboration among workers in complex organizations.
- A strong corporate culture is necessary for establishing norms and reducing misunderstandings, which are essential for accomplishing tasks through many steps of collaboration.
- Building a strong corporate culture requires costly voluntary investments by many workers, leading to free-riding problems that become severe in large organizations.
- Voluntary contributions to corporate culture can be sustained because an organization's equilibrium productivity is highly sensitive to individual contributions.
- Even small investments in corporate culture can have a significant impact on overall productivity.
- The completion of complex tasks is necessarily fragile to small shocks that damage the organization's culture, meaning even minor disruptions or changes can have significant negative effects on collaboration and productivity.
- Investing in and maintaining a strong corporate culture is ultimately necessary for sustaining productivity and avoiding fragility in the face of small shocks or disruptions.
Authors: Matthew Elliott, Benjamin Golub, Matthieu V. Leduc
Abstract: Complex organizations accomplish tasks through many steps of collaboration among workers. Corporate culture supports collaborations by establishing norms and reducing misunderstandings. Because a strong corporate culture relies on costly, voluntary investments by many workers, we model it as an organizational public good, subject to standard free-riding problems, which become severe in large organizations. Our main finding is that voluntary contributions to culture can nevertheless be sustained, because an organization's equilibrium productivity is endogenously highly sensitive to individual contributions. However, the completion of complex tasks is then necessarily fragile to small shocks that damage the organization's culture.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.