Corporate Culture and Organizational Fragility

AI-generated keywords: Corporate Culture Organizational Fragility Collaboration Productivity Free-Riding

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Corporate culture plays a crucial role in facilitating collaboration among workers in complex organizations.
  • A strong corporate culture is necessary for establishing norms and reducing misunderstandings, which are essential for accomplishing tasks through many steps of collaboration.
  • Building a strong corporate culture requires costly voluntary investments by many workers, leading to free-riding problems that become severe in large organizations.
  • Voluntary contributions to corporate culture can be sustained because an organization's equilibrium productivity is highly sensitive to individual contributions.
  • Even small investments in corporate culture can have a significant impact on overall productivity.
  • The completion of complex tasks is necessarily fragile to small shocks that damage the organization's culture, meaning even minor disruptions or changes can have significant negative effects on collaboration and productivity.
  • Investing in and maintaining a strong corporate culture is ultimately necessary for sustaining productivity and avoiding fragility in the face of small shocks or disruptions.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Matthew Elliott, Benjamin Golub, Matthieu V. Leduc

Abstract: Complex organizations accomplish tasks through many steps of collaboration among workers. Corporate culture supports collaborations by establishing norms and reducing misunderstandings. Because a strong corporate culture relies on costly, voluntary investments by many workers, we model it as an organizational public good, subject to standard free-riding problems, which become severe in large organizations. Our main finding is that voluntary contributions to culture can nevertheless be sustained, because an organization's equilibrium productivity is endogenously highly sensitive to individual contributions. However, the completion of complex tasks is then necessarily fragile to small shocks that damage the organization's culture.

Submitted to arXiv on 21 Jan. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2301.08907v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper "Corporate Culture and Organizational Fragility," Matthew Elliott, Benjamin Golub, and Matthieu V. Leduc explore the role of corporate culture in facilitating collaboration among workers in complex organizations. They argue that a strong corporate culture is essential for establishing norms and reducing misunderstandings which are necessary for accomplishing tasks through many steps of collaboration. However, building a strong corporate culture requires costly voluntary investments by many workers which can lead to free-riding problems that become severe in large organizations. To address this issue, the authors model corporate culture as an organizational public good subject to standard free-riding problems. Their main finding is that voluntary contributions to culture can nevertheless be sustained because an organization's equilibrium productivity is highly sensitive to individual contributions. In other words, even small investments in corporate culture can have a significant impact on overall productivity. The authors also note that the completion of complex tasks is necessarily fragile to small shocks that damage the organization's culture. This means that even minor disruptions or changes can have significant negative effects on collaboration and productivity. Overall, the authors' research highlights the importance of investing in and maintaining a strong corporate culture for successful collaboration and task completion in complex organizations. While such investments may be costly and require voluntary contributions from many workers, they are ultimately necessary for sustaining productivity and avoiding fragility in the face of small shocks or disruptions.
Created on 29 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.