Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Engine

AI-generated keywords: ChatGPT Translation GPT-4 Pivot Prompting Performance

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT as a machine translator
  • Focus on translation prompt, multilingual translation, and translation robustness
  • ChatGPT performs well with recommended prompts for translation ability
  • Competes competitively with Google Translate for high-resource European languages
  • Falls behind significantly for low-resource or distant languages
  • Good results for spoken language but not as good for biomedical abstracts or Reddit comments
  • Introduction of "pivot prompting" strategy for distant languages, resulting in improved performance
  • GPT-4 engine enhances translation performance, even for distant languages
  • ChatGPT with GPT-3.5 generates more hallucinations and mis-translations compared to GPT-4
  • GPT-4 has better overall accuracy and fewer errors than GPT-3.5
  • ChatGPT has become a reliable translator due to advancements brought by GPT-4
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Wenxiang Jiao, Wenxuan Wang, Jen-tse Huang, Xing Wang, Shuming Shi, Zhaopeng Tu

Analyzed/compared the outputs between ChatGPT and Google Translate; both automatic and human evaluation

Abstract: This report provides a preliminary evaluation of ChatGPT for machine translation, including translation prompt, multilingual translation, and translation robustness. We adopt the prompts advised by ChatGPT to trigger its translation ability and find that the candidate prompts generally work well with minor performance differences. By evaluating on a number of benchmark test sets, we find that ChatGPT performs competitively with commercial translation products (e.g., Google Translate) on high-resource European languages but lags behind significantly on low-resource or distant languages. As for the translation robustness, ChatGPT does not perform as well as the commercial systems on biomedical abstracts or Reddit comments but exhibits good results on spoken language. Further, we explore an interesting strategy named $\mathbf{pivot~prompting}$ for distant languages, which asks ChatGPT to translate the source sentence into a high-resource pivot language before into the target language, improving the translation performance noticeably. With the launch of the GPT-4 engine, the translation performance of ChatGPT is significantly boosted, becoming comparable to commercial translation products, even for distant languages. Human analysis on Google Translate and ChatGPT suggests that ChatGPT with GPT-3.5 tends to generate more hallucinations and mis-translation errors while that with GPT-4 makes the least errors. In other words, ChatGPT has already become a good translator. Please refer to our Github project for more details: https://github.com/wxjiao/Is-ChatGPT-A-Good-Translator

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Jan. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2301.08745v4

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

This report presents a comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT as a machine translator, focusing on translation prompt, multilingual translation, and translation robustness. The study finds that ChatGPT performs well with minor performance differences when using the prompts recommended by ChatGPT to trigger its translation ability. It competes competitively with commercial translation products like Google Translate for high-resource European languages but falls behind significantly for low-resource or distant languages. While ChatGPT does not perform as well as commercial systems for biomedical abstracts or Reddit comments, it exhibits good results for spoken language. The report also introduces an interesting strategy called "pivot prompting" for distant languages. This strategy involves translating the source sentence into a high-resource pivot language before translating it into the target language, resulting in noticeable improvements in translation performance. With the launch of the GPT-4 engine, the translation performance of ChatGPT is significantly enhanced and becomes comparable to commercial translation products even for distant languages. Human analysis comparing Google Translate and ChatGPT reveals that ChatGPT with GPT-3.5 tends to generate more hallucinations and mis-translation errors compared to GPT-4 which makes fewer errors and has better overall accuracy. Overall, this study concludes that ChatGPT has become a reliable translator due to the advancements brought by GPT-4 and can compete effectively with commercial systems in terms of accuracy and performance.
Created on 25 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.