Is ChatGPT a Good Recommender? A Preliminary Study

AI-generated keywords: ChatGPT Recommendation Few-shot Prompting Natural Language Processing Human Evaluation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • ChatGPT has shown advancements in natural language processing tasks
  • The paper explores using ChatGPT as a general-purpose recommendation system
  • Evaluation of ChatGPT's performance as a recommendation model is done through prompts and five different recommendation scenarios
  • No fine-tuning of ChatGPT is done during the evaluation process, relying solely on prompts
  • Few-shot prompting is introduced to enhance ChatGPT's understanding of user needs and preferences
  • Experimental results on the Amazon Beauty dataset show promising outcomes in certain tasks and baseline-level performance in others
  • Human evaluations confirm that ChatGPT can comprehend provided information and generate clearer and more reasonable results
  • Language models like ChatGPT have untapped potential for improving recommendation systems' performance
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Junling Liu, Chao Liu, Renjie Lv, Kang Zhou, Yan Zhang

Abstract: Recommendation systems have witnessed significant advancements and have been widely used over the past decades. However, most traditional recommendation methods are task-specific and therefore lack efficient generalization ability. Recently, the emergence of ChatGPT has significantly advanced NLP tasks by enhancing the capabilities of conversational models. Nonetheless, the application of ChatGPT in the recommendation domain has not been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, we employ ChatGPT as a general-purpose recommendation model to explore its potential for transferring extensive linguistic and world knowledge acquired from large-scale corpora to recommendation scenarios. Specifically, we design a set of prompts and evaluate ChatGPT's performance on five recommendation scenarios. Unlike traditional recommendation methods, we do not fine-tune ChatGPT during the entire evaluation process, relying only on the prompts themselves to convert recommendation tasks into natural language tasks. Further, we explore the use of few-shot prompting to inject interaction information that contains user potential interest to help ChatGPT better understand user needs and interests. Comprehensive experimental results on Amazon Beauty dataset show that ChatGPT has achieved promising results in certain tasks and is capable of reaching the baseline level in others. We conduct human evaluations on two explainability-oriented tasks to more accurately evaluate the quality of contents generated by different models. And the human evaluations show ChatGPT can truly understand the provided information and generate clearer and more reasonable results. We hope that our study can inspire researchers to further explore the potential of language models like ChatGPT to improve recommendation performance and contribute to the advancement of the recommendation systems field.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.10149v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Is ChatGPT a Good Recommender? A Preliminary Study" explores the potential of using ChatGPT, a conversational model, as a general-purpose recommendation system. The authors highlight that while traditional recommendation methods lack efficient generalization ability, ChatGPT has shown significant advancements in natural language processing tasks. To evaluate ChatGPT's performance as a recommendation model, the authors design a set of prompts and assess its capabilities in five different recommendation scenarios. Notably, they do not fine-tune ChatGPT during the evaluation process but rely solely on the prompts to convert recommendation tasks into natural language tasks. The study also introduces the concept of few-shot prompting to inject interaction information containing user potential interests. This approach aims to enhance ChatGPT's understanding of user needs and preferences. The experimental results on the Amazon Beauty dataset demonstrate promising outcomes in certain tasks and baseline-level performance in others. To further evaluate the quality of generated content by different models, human evaluations are conducted on two explainability-oriented tasks. These evaluations confirm that ChatGPT can genuinely comprehend provided information and generate clearer and more reasonable results. Overall, this preliminary study suggests that language models like ChatGPT have untapped potential for improving recommendation systems' performance and encourages researchers to delve deeper into leveraging such models to advance recommendations and contribute to this field's progress.
Created on 13 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.