How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detection

AI-generated keywords: ChatGPT LLMs HC3 Detection Systems Linguistic Analysis

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • ChatGPT has generated significant interest in academic and industrial communities due to its ability to provide comprehensive and fluent responses to a wide range of human questions.
  • ChatGPT surpasses previous public chatbots in terms of security and usefulness.
  • Concerns have been raised about the potential negative impacts that large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT could have on society, including fake news, plagiarism, and social security issues.
  • A team of researchers led by Biyang Guo conducted an extensive study comparing ChatGPT's responses with those of human experts across various domains such as open-domain, financial, medical, legal, and psychological areas.
  • The Human ChatGPT Comparison Corpus (HC3) dataset was created for analysis from tens of thousands of comparison responses collected from both sources.
  • The study revealed interesting insights into the characteristics of ChatGPT's responses compared to those generated by humans.
  • The researchers developed three different detection systems to effectively distinguish between text generated by ChatGPT or humans.
  • The HC3 dataset is publicly available along with code and models at https://github.com/Hello-SimpleAI/chatgpt-comparison-detection for further research in this area.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Biyang Guo, Xin Zhang, Ziyuan Wang, Minqi Jiang, Jinran Nie, Yuxuan Ding, Jianwei Yue, Yupeng Wu

https://github.com/Hello-SimpleAI/chatgpt-comparison-detection

Abstract: The introduction of ChatGPT has garnered widespread attention in both academic and industrial communities. ChatGPT is able to respond effectively to a wide range of human questions, providing fluent and comprehensive answers that significantly surpass previous public chatbots in terms of security and usefulness. On one hand, people are curious about how ChatGPT is able to achieve such strength and how far it is from human experts. On the other hand, people are starting to worry about the potential negative impacts that large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT could have on society, such as fake news, plagiarism, and social security issues. In this work, we collected tens of thousands of comparison responses from both human experts and ChatGPT, with questions ranging from open-domain, financial, medical, legal, and psychological areas. We call the collected dataset the Human ChatGPT Comparison Corpus (HC3). Based on the HC3 dataset, we study the characteristics of ChatGPT's responses, the differences and gaps from human experts, and future directions for LLMs. We conducted comprehensive human evaluations and linguistic analyses of ChatGPT-generated content compared with that of humans, where many interesting results are revealed. After that, we conduct extensive experiments on how to effectively detect whether a certain text is generated by ChatGPT or humans. We build three different detection systems, explore several key factors that influence their effectiveness, and evaluate them in different scenarios. The dataset, code, and models are all publicly available at https://github.com/Hello-SimpleAI/chatgpt-comparison-detection.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Jan. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2301.07597v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The development of ChatGPT has generated significant interest in both academic and industrial communities due to its ability to provide comprehensive and fluent responses to a wide range of human questions, surpassing previous public chatbots in terms of security and usefulness. However, concerns have been raised about the potential negative impacts that large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT could have on society, including fake news, plagiarism, and social security issues. To address these concerns, a team of researchers led by Biyang Guo conducted an extensive study comparing ChatGPT's responses with those of human experts across various domains such as open-domain, financial, medical, legal, and psychological areas. The team collected tens of thousands of comparison responses from both sources and created the Human ChatGPT Comparison Corpus (HC3) dataset for analysis. The study revealed interesting insights into the characteristics of ChatGPT's responses compared to those generated by humans. The researchers conducted comprehensive evaluations and linguistic analyses to identify differences and gaps between the two sources. They also explored future directions for LLMs based on their findings. In addition to this analysis, the team also developed three different detection systems to effectively distinguish between text generated by ChatGPT or humans. They explored several key factors that influence their effectiveness and evaluated them in different scenarios. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the capabilities and limitations of large language models like ChatGPT. The HC3 dataset is publicly available along with code and models at https://github.com/Hello-SimpleAI/chatgpt-comparison-detection for further research in this area.
Created on 01 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.