Strong gravitational lensing's `external shear' is not shear
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Distribution of mass in galaxy-scale strong gravitational lenses is often modelled as an elliptical power law plus 'external shear'
- External shear accounts for neighbouring galaxies and cosmic shear
- Recent study by Amy Etherington et al. shows that external shear is not physically meaningful but rather a fudge to compensate for lack of model complexity
- Best-fit values of external shear do not correlate with independent measurements of shear from weak lensing in 45 Hubble Space Telescope images or in 50 mock images of lenses with complex distributions of mass, except in rare systems
- Best-fit shear is aligned with the major or minor axis of 88% of lens galaxies, and the amplitude of the external shear increases if that galaxy is disky
- This finding has significant implications since it biases other model parameters that are interpreted as physically meaningful in several science analyses such as measuring galaxy evolution, dark matter physics, or cosmological parameters
- Future studies should employ more flexible mass models instead of relying on the current power law plus external shear model to ensure accurate results from these science analyses.
Authors: Amy Etherington, James W. Nightingale, Richard Massey, Sut-Ieng Tam, XiaoYue Cao, Anna Niemiec, Qiuhan He, Andrew Robertson, Ran Li, Aristeidis Amvrosiadis, Shaun Cole, Jose M. Diego, Carlos S. Frenk, Brenda L. Frye, David Harvey, Mathilde Jauzac, Anton M. Koekemoer, David J. Lagattuta, Marceau Limousin, Guillaume Mahler, Ellen Sirks, Charles L. Steinhardt
Abstract: The distribution of mass in galaxy-scale strong gravitational lenses is often modelled as an elliptical power law plus `external shear', which notionally accounts for neighbouring galaxies and cosmic shear. We show that it does not. Except in a handful of rare systems, the best-fit values of external shear do not correlate with independent measurements of shear: from weak lensing in 45 Hubble Space Telescope images, or in 50 mock images of lenses with complex distributions of mass. Instead, the best-fit shear is aligned with the major or minor axis of 88% of lens galaxies; and the amplitude of the external shear increases if that galaxy is disky. We conclude that `external shear' attached to a power law model is not physically meaningful, but a fudge to compensate for lack of model complexity. Since it biases other model parameters that are interpreted as physically meaningful in several science analyses (e.g. measuring galaxy evolution, dark matter physics or cosmological parameters), we recommend that future studies of galaxy-scale strong lensing should employ more flexible mass models.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.