Reasoning about Causality in Games
AI-generated Key Points
- The paper "Reasoning about Causality in Games" focuses on the intersection of causal reasoning and game-theoretic reasoning.
- The authors propose a formal framework that supports both forms of reasoning through structural causal games.
- The paper considers three key questions: how can the (causal) dependencies in games be modeled in a uniform, principled manner; how may causal queries be computed in causal games, and what assumptions does this require; and how do causal games compare to existing formalisms?
- To address question one, the authors introduce mechanized games that encode dependencies between agents' decision rules and the distributions governing the game.
- For question two, they present definitions of predictions, interventions, and counterfactuals, discussing the assumptions required for each.
- Regarding question three, they describe correspondences between causal games and other formalisms while explaining how causal games can answer queries that other models do not support.
- The paper also highlights possible applications of causal games aided by an extensive open-source Python library.
- One such application is settable systems inspired by generalised structural causal models used to capture optimization, equilibria, and learning.
Authors: Lewis Hammond, James Fox, Tom Everitt, Ryan Carey, Alessandro Abate, Michael Wooldridge
Abstract: Causal reasoning and game-theoretic reasoning are fundamental topics in artificial intelligence, among many other disciplines: this paper is concerned with their intersection. Despite their importance, a formal framework that supports both these forms of reasoning has, until now, been lacking. We offer a solution in the form of (structural) causal games, which can be seen as extending Pearl's causal hierarchy to the game-theoretic domain, or as extending Koller and Milch's multi-agent influence diagrams to the causal domain. We then consider three key questions: i) How can the (causal) dependencies in games - either between variables, or between strategies - be modelled in a uniform, principled manner? ii) How may causal queries be computed in causal games, and what assumptions does this require? iii) How do causal games compare to existing formalisms? To address question i), we introduce mechanised games, which encode dependencies between agents' decision rules and the distributions governing the game. In response to question ii), we present definitions of predictions, interventions, and counterfactuals, and discuss the assumptions required for each. Regarding question iii), we describe correspondences between causal games and other formalisms, and explain how causal games can be used to answer queries that other causal or game-theoretic models do not support. Finally, we highlight possible applications of causal games, aided by an extensive open-source Python library.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.