FATE in AI: Towards Algorithmic Inclusivity and Accessibility

AI-generated keywords: FATE AI MEDC Global South Responsible AI

AI-generated Key Points

  • The widespread deployment of AI technology is affecting many sections of society with economic and personal implications.
  • Issues of fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics (FATE) have arisen to address algorithmic disparities in AI.
  • Ethical AI aims to incorporate moral behavior to avoid encoding bias in AI's decisions.
  • Concerns have been raised regarding neglecting local knowledge, cultural pluralism, and global fairness in the present discourse on critical issues shaped by more economically developed countries (MEDC).
  • A study was conducted to assess FATE-related issues and the effectiveness of transparency methods with a focus on underserved areas in the Global South.
  • An online user survey was conducted with 43 participants to collect relevant data and assess FATE-related issues using ads data from online social networks.
  • Explanations about decisions reached by AI systems tend to be vague and less informative.
  • There is a need to engage with the community for the best way to integrate FATE into decision-making processes to bridge the accessibility and inclusivity gap in AI.
  • For a successful national AI strategy in Africa where organizations offer AI-supported services across some countries, there is a need for algorithmic accountability, data protection, and explainability of decision-making by AI models.
  • It is crucial not only to incorporate sociodemographic factors but also viewpoints from affected communities when deploying AI systems globally.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Isa Inuwa-Dutse

20 pages, 4 figures, 7 Tables
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: One of the defining phenomena in this age is the widespread deployment of systems powered by artificial intelligence (AI) technology. With AI taking the center stage, many sections of society are being affected directly or indirectly by algorithmic decisions. Algorithmic decisions carry both economical and personal implications which have brought about the issues of fairness, accountability, transparency and ethics (FATE) in AI geared towards addressing algorithmic disparities. Ethical AI deals with incorporating moral behaviour to avoid encoding bias in AI's decisions. However, the present discourse on such critical issues is being shaped by the more economically developed countries (MEDC), which raises concerns regarding neglecting local knowledge, cultural pluralism and global fairness. This study builds upon existing research on responsible AI, with a focus on areas in the Global South considered to be under-served vis-a-vis AI. Our goal is two-fold (1) to assess FATE-related issues and the effectiveness of transparency methods and (2) to proffer useful insights and stimulate action towards bridging the accessibility and inclusivity gap in AI. Using ads data from online social networks, we designed a user study (n=43) to achieve the above goals. Among the findings from the study include: explanations about decisions reached by the AI systems tend to be vague and less informative. To bridge the accessibility and inclusivity gap, there is a need to engage with the community for the best way to integrate fairness, accountability, transparency and ethics in AI. This will help in empowering the affected community or individual to effectively probe and police the growing application of AI-powered systems.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Jan. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2301.01590v1

The widespread deployment of systems powered by artificial intelligence (AI) technology has become a defining phenomenon in this age. Algorithmic decisions made by AI are affecting many sections of society, both directly and indirectly, with economic and personal implications. The issues of fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics (FATE) have arisen to address algorithmic disparities in AI. Ethical AI aims to incorporate moral behavior to avoid encoding bias in AI's decisions. However, the present discourse on such critical issues is being shaped by more economically developed countries (MEDC), which raises concerns regarding neglecting local knowledge, cultural pluralism, and global fairness. To address these concerns, a study was conducted that builds upon existing research on responsible AI with a focus on areas in the Global South considered underserved vis-a-vis AI. The study's goal is twofold: firstly, to assess FATE-related issues and the effectiveness of transparency methods; secondly, to proffer useful insights and stimulate action towards bridging the accessibility and inclusivity gap in AI. The approach involved both qualitative and quantitative methods. An online user survey was conducted with 43 participants to collect relevant data and assess FATE-related issues using ads data from online social networks. The study found that explanations about decisions reached by the AI systems tend to be vague and less informative. To bridge the accessibility and inclusivity gap in AI there is a need to engage with the community for the best way to integrate fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics into their decision making processes. For a successful national AI strategy in Africa where organisations such as African Development Bank offer AI-supported services across some countries [59], there is a need to ensure algorithmic accountability, data protection, and explainability of decision-making by AI models. In conclusion, as Artificial Intelligence systems continue to be deployed across various domains globally [7-14], it is crucial not only to incorporate sociodemographic factors but also viewpoints from affected communities to avoid promoting bias or unfair algorithmic decisions. This study presents a useful approach for examining FATE related issues with an emphasis on areas not traditionally served by Artificial Intelligence systems.
Created on 26 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.