Wealth Redistribution and Mutual Aid: Comparison using Equivalent/Nonequivalent Exchange Models of Econophysics
AI-generated Key Points
- Historian Sheidel has observed that economic inequality decreases during times of wars, revolutions, collapse of states, and epidemics
- Current crises such as COVID-19 pandemic, war in Ukraine, and natural disasters caused by global warming may accelerate the arrival of a new mode of exchange and facilitate the transition from a capitalist economy to alternatives suggested by Graeber and Karatani
- This study compares an equivalent market exchange with redistribution based on power centers and a nonequivalent exchange with mutual aid using Polanyi, Graeber, and Karatani modes of exchange
- The simulations indicate that the evaluation parameter of total exchange divided by Gini index can be expressed by the same saturated curvilinear approximate equation using transfer rate and time period of redistribution along with surplus contribution rate of wealthy individuals and saving rate
- A nonequivalent exchange without return obligation is preferred due to coercion associated with taxes and independence based on morality of mutual aid. This aligns with Graeber's baseline communism and Karatani's mode of exchange D while also having implications for alternatives to capitalist economy.
- Limitations include setting transfer rates uniformly across all agents in equivalent market exchanges model (EX) or setting surplus contribution rates uniformly across all agents in nonequivalent exchanges model (NX)
- Future analytical studies should consider different transfer rates based on social security programs or varying surplus contribution rates according to ability/needs. Empirical studies are needed to examine real-world evidence.
- Future studies could consider redistribution/mutual aid of interest/profit-loss for wealthy/poor individuals using non-conservative models such as those introduced by Kato in comparison of Islamic and capitalist economies.
- Other models such as potential function-based probability distributions for income/expenditure or population dynamics-based time developments for growth/inequality could be explored. Non-conservative models must consider resource limits' constraints however eventually returning to a conservative model primarily based on exchange.
Authors: Takeshi Kato
Abstract: Given the wealth inequality worldwide, there is an urgent need to identify the mode of wealth exchange through which it arises. To address the research gap regarding models that combine equivalent exchange and redistribution, this study compares an equivalent market exchange with redistribution based on power centers and a nonequivalent exchange with mutual aid using the Polanyi, Graeber, and Karatani modes of exchange. Two new exchange models based on multi-agent interactions are reconstructed following an econophysics approach for evaluating the Gini index (inequality) and total exchange (economic flow). Exchange simulations indicate that the evaluation parameter of the total exchange divided by the Gini index can be expressed by the same saturated curvilinear approximate equation using the wealth transfer rate and time period of redistribution and the surplus contribution rate of the wealthy and the saving rate. However, considering the coercion of taxes and its associated costs and independence based on the morality of mutual aid, a nonequivalent exchange without return obligation is preferred. This is oriented toward Graeber's baseline communism and Karatani's mode of exchange D, with implications for alternatives to the capitalist economy.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.