Are Deep Neural Networks SMARTer than Second Graders?
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Deep learning has made remarkable progress in recent times
- Neural networks are being used to solve complex tasks such as playing Go, generating art, and question answering
- The generalizability of these networks when it comes to solving problems that require broad skills is questioned
- A team of researchers led by Anoop Cherian proposed the Simple Multimodal Algorithmic Reasoning Task (SMART) and its associated SMART-101 dataset to address this question
- The dataset comprises 101 unique puzzles designed specifically for children aged 6-8 years old
- Each puzzle requires a mix of several elementary skills such as arithmetic, algebra, and spatial reasoning to solve
- To scale the dataset towards training deep neural networks, the team programmatically generated entirely new instances for each puzzle while retaining their solution algorithm
- Powerful deep models offer reasonable performances on puzzles they are trained on but are not better than random accuracy when analyzed for generalization
- The recent ChatGPT large language model was evaluated on a subset of the dataset and found to produce convincing reasoning abilities but often provided incorrect answers
- The study's authors include Kuan-Chuan Peng, Suhas Lohit, Kevin Smith, Joshua B. Tenenbaum in addition to Anoop Cherian
- Current deep learning models may not be as generalizable as previously thought when it comes to solving problems requiring broad skills like those tested in SMART-101
Authors: Anoop Cherian, Kuan-Chuan Peng, Suhas Lohit, Kevin Smith, Joshua B. Tenenbaum
Abstract: Recent times have witnessed an increasing number of applications of deep neural networks towards solving tasks that require superior cognitive abilities, e.g., playing Go, generating art, question answering (such as ChatGPT), etc. Such a dramatic progress raises the question: how generalizable are neural networks in solving problems that demand broad skills? To answer this question, we propose SMART: a Simple Multimodal Algorithmic Reasoning Task and the associated SMART-101 dataset, for evaluating the abstraction, deduction, and generalization abilities of neural networks in solving visuo-linguistic puzzles designed specifically for children in the 6-8 age group. Our dataset consists of 101 unique puzzles; each puzzle comprises a picture and a question, and their solution needs a mix of several elementary skills, including arithmetic, algebra, and spatial reasoning, among others. To scale our dataset towards training deep neural networks, we programmatically generate entirely new instances for each puzzle while retaining their solution algorithm. To benchmark the performance on the SMART-101 dataset, we propose a vision and language meta-learning model using varied state-of-the-art backbone neural networks. Our experiments reveal that while powerful deep models offer reasonable performances on puzzles that they are trained on, they are not better than random accuracy when analyzed for generalization. We also evaluate the recent ChatGPT large language model on a subset of our dataset and find that while ChatGPT produces convincing reasoning abilities, the answers are often incorrect.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.