Are Deep Neural Networks SMARTer than Second Graders?

AI-generated keywords: Deep Learning SMART-101 Meta-Learning Generalization ChatGPT

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Deep learning has made remarkable progress in recent times
  • Neural networks are being used to solve complex tasks such as playing Go, generating art, and question answering
  • The generalizability of these networks when it comes to solving problems that require broad skills is questioned
  • A team of researchers led by Anoop Cherian proposed the Simple Multimodal Algorithmic Reasoning Task (SMART) and its associated SMART-101 dataset to address this question
  • The dataset comprises 101 unique puzzles designed specifically for children aged 6-8 years old
  • Each puzzle requires a mix of several elementary skills such as arithmetic, algebra, and spatial reasoning to solve
  • To scale the dataset towards training deep neural networks, the team programmatically generated entirely new instances for each puzzle while retaining their solution algorithm
  • Powerful deep models offer reasonable performances on puzzles they are trained on but are not better than random accuracy when analyzed for generalization
  • The recent ChatGPT large language model was evaluated on a subset of the dataset and found to produce convincing reasoning abilities but often provided incorrect answers
  • The study's authors include Kuan-Chuan Peng, Suhas Lohit, Kevin Smith, Joshua B. Tenenbaum in addition to Anoop Cherian
  • Current deep learning models may not be as generalizable as previously thought when it comes to solving problems requiring broad skills like those tested in SMART-101
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Anoop Cherian, Kuan-Chuan Peng, Suhas Lohit, Kevin Smith, Joshua B. Tenenbaum

Abstract: Recent times have witnessed an increasing number of applications of deep neural networks towards solving tasks that require superior cognitive abilities, e.g., playing Go, generating art, question answering (such as ChatGPT), etc. Such a dramatic progress raises the question: how generalizable are neural networks in solving problems that demand broad skills? To answer this question, we propose SMART: a Simple Multimodal Algorithmic Reasoning Task and the associated SMART-101 dataset, for evaluating the abstraction, deduction, and generalization abilities of neural networks in solving visuo-linguistic puzzles designed specifically for children in the 6-8 age group. Our dataset consists of 101 unique puzzles; each puzzle comprises a picture and a question, and their solution needs a mix of several elementary skills, including arithmetic, algebra, and spatial reasoning, among others. To scale our dataset towards training deep neural networks, we programmatically generate entirely new instances for each puzzle while retaining their solution algorithm. To benchmark the performance on the SMART-101 dataset, we propose a vision and language meta-learning model using varied state-of-the-art backbone neural networks. Our experiments reveal that while powerful deep models offer reasonable performances on puzzles that they are trained on, they are not better than random accuracy when analyzed for generalization. We also evaluate the recent ChatGPT large language model on a subset of our dataset and find that while ChatGPT produces convincing reasoning abilities, the answers are often incorrect.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Dec. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2212.09993v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The field of deep learning has seen remarkable progress in recent times, with neural networks being applied to solve complex tasks such as playing Go, generating art, and question answering. However, the question arises as to how generalizable these networks are when it comes to solving problems that require broad skills. To address this question, a team of researchers led by Anoop Cherian proposed the Simple Multimodal Algorithmic Reasoning Task (SMART) and its associated SMART-101 dataset. The dataset comprises 101 unique puzzles designed specifically for children aged 6-8 years old. Each puzzle consists of a picture and a question that requires a mix of several elementary skills such as arithmetic, algebra, and spatial reasoning to solve. To scale the dataset towards training deep neural networks, the team programmatically generated entirely new instances for each puzzle while retaining their solution algorithm. To benchmark the performance on the SMART-101 dataset, the team proposed a vision and language meta-learning model using varied state-of-the-art backbone neural networks. The experiments revealed that while powerful deep models offer reasonable performances on puzzles they are trained on, they are not better than random accuracy when analyzed for generalization. Furthermore, the recent ChatGPT large language model was evaluated on a subset of the dataset and found to produce convincing reasoning abilities but often provided incorrect answers. The study's authors include Kuan-Chuan Peng, Suhas Lohit, Kevin Smith, and Joshua B. Tenenbaum in addition to Anoop Cherian. Their findings suggest that current deep learning models may not be as generalizable as previously thought when it comes to solving problems requiring broad skills like those tested in SMART-101.
Created on 23 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.