Deriving dualities in pointfree topology from Priestley duality

AI-generated keywords: Pointfree Topology Duality Hofmann-Lawson Isbell Priestley

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Hofmann-Lawson duality: category of continuous frames is dually equivalent to the category of locally compact sober spaces
  • Equivalence between stably continuous frames and stably locally compact spaces
  • Isbell duality: equivalence between compact regular frames and compact Hausdorff spaces
  • Novel approach using Priestley duality for distributive lattices to derive these dualities
  • Implications for various areas within mathematics
  • Contributes to understanding connections in pointfree topology and deriving dualities from basic principles
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: G. Bezhanishvili, S. Melzer

31 pages, 2 figures, 3 tables, minor revisions

Abstract: There are several prominent duality results in pointfree topology. The Hofmann-Lawson duality establishes that the category of continuous frames is dually equivalent to the category of locally compact sober spaces. This restricts to a dual equivalence between the categories of stably continuous frames and stably locally compact spaces, which further restricts to Isbell duality between the categories of compact regular frames and compact Hausdorff spaces. We show how to derive these dualities from Priestley duality for distributive lattices, thus shedding new light on these classic results.

Submitted to arXiv on 19 Dec. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2212.09224v3

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of pointfree topology, there are several important duality results that establish connections between different categories of mathematical structures. One such result is the Hofmann-Lawson duality, which shows that the category of continuous frames is dually equivalent to the category of locally compact sober spaces. This means that these two categories have similar properties and can be studied in parallel. Building on this duality, further equivalences can be derived. For example, there is a dual equivalence between the categories of stably continuous frames and stably locally compact spaces. This implies that these categories also share similar properties and can be understood through each other. Additionally, Isbell duality arises as a restriction of the Hofmann-Lawson duality. Isbell duality establishes an equivalence between the categories of compact regular frames and compact Hausdorff spaces. This result provides a deeper understanding into the relationship between these two types of mathematical structures. The authors of this paper present a novel approach to deriving these dualities by using Priestley duality for distributive lattices. By applying this well-known concept from lattice theory, they shed new light on classic results in pointfree topology and offer insights into how these dualities can be derived from fundamental concepts in mathematics. The findings presented in this paper have implications for various areas within mathematics and may inspire further exploration and applications in related fields. Overall, this research contributes to our understanding of the connections between different categories in pointfree topology and provides valuable insights into how these dualities can be derived from basic principles in mathematics.
Created on 22 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.