Towards Robust Handwritten Text Recognition with On-the-fly User Participation
AI-generated Key Points
- Handwritten text recognition is challenging for Indic scripts with over 100 unique basic Unicode characters.
- Existing OCR systems perform well when the test set's distribution is similar to the data used to train them, but performance drastically reduces in real-world scenarios.
- A controlled framework for long-term OCR services has been proposed to consistently upgrade an existing Handwritten Hindi OCR model three times on the dataset of 15 users.
- The proposed strategy involves fixing the budget of four users for each iteration and using Curriculum Learning (CL) on data available in current and previous iterations.
- Insights into investigations on CL, user selection, and data from unseen writing styles have been provided along with testing of upgraded models on held-out sets of one page each from all 23 users.
- This work can be used for long-term OCR services in crowd-sourcing scenarios for service providers and end-users alike.
- Most Indic languages derived from Indic script are at risk of vanishing due to lack of efforts to preserve them.
- Several methods offer solutions to Indic handwritten text recognition tasks categorized into segmentation free but lexicon dependent methods; segmentation dependent methods; and sequence-to-sequence i.e., cnn-rnn methods.
Authors: Ajoy Mondal, Rohit saluja, C. V. Jawahar
Abstract: Long-term OCR services aim to provide high-quality output to their users at competitive costs. It is essential to upgrade the models because of the complex data loaded by the users. The service providers encourage the users who provide data where the OCR model fails by rewarding them based on data complexity, readability, and available budget. Hitherto, the OCR works include preparing the models on standard datasets without considering the end-users. We propose a strategy of consistently upgrading an existing Handwritten Hindi OCR model three times on the dataset of 15 users. We fix the budget of 4 users for each iteration. For the first iteration, the model directly trains on the dataset from the first four users. For the rest iteration, all remaining users write a page each, which service providers later analyze to select the 4 (new) best users based on the quality of predictions on the human-readable words. Selected users write 23 more pages for upgrading the model. We upgrade the model with Curriculum Learning (CL) on the data available in the current iteration and compare the subset from previous iterations. The upgraded model is tested on a held-out set of one page each from all 23 users. We provide insights into our investigations on the effect of CL, user selection, and especially the data from unseen writing styles. Our work can be used for long-term OCR services in crowd-sourcing scenarios for the service providers and end users.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.