The research content hosted by arXiv is not fully accessible to everyone due to disabilities and other barriers. This issue is significant because a considerable proportion of people have reading and visual disabilities, and it is crucial for the scientific community that arXiv is as open as possible in order to advance science through wide and diverse participation. Moreover, there are mandates to become accessible, and accessible content benefits everyone. The user journey table shows that most steps in accessing research were dominated by negative experiences, with only finding research being mostly positive. The highest number of comments was elicited by reading research followed by preparing documents. Researchers who rely on assistive technology point out PDF as the biggest stumbling block to accessible research. Participants who do not rely on assistive technology find it challenging to visualize accessing research in new ways that might break their current PDF-dependent workflow. ArXiv has a role to play in improving the accessibility of research papers since it can have a powerful and immediate impact on making research more accessible. HTML is just one step towards a greater vision of accessibility since current accessibility standards are only a starting point for making things work for people with disabilities, which requires more than just meeting legal requirements. Many interviewees pointed out that a paper is just a portal to the knowledge behind it; they don't necessarily need access to the paper if they can absorb the research itself. Therefore, arXiv's proposed next step towards more open science includes offering HTML alongside existing PDF and TeX formats since HTML offers many benefits over PDF as an accessible format for scientific documents.

• - The research content hosted by arXiv is not fully accessible to everyone due to disabilities and other barriers.
• - A considerable proportion of people have reading and visual disabilities, which makes it crucial for the scientific community that arXiv is as open as possible in order to advance science through wide and diverse participation.
• - Accessible content benefits everyone, and there are mandates to become accessible.
• - Most steps in accessing research were dominated by negative experiences, with only finding research being mostly positive.
• - Researchers who rely on assistive technology point out PDF as the biggest stumbling block to accessible research.
• - Participants who do not rely on assistive technology find it challenging to visualize accessing research in new ways that might break their current PDF-dependent workflow.
• - ArXiv has a role to play in improving the accessibility of research papers since it can have a powerful and immediate impact on making research more accessible.
• - HTML is just one step towards a greater vision of accessibility since current accessibility standards are only a starting point for making things work for people with disabilities, which requires more than just meeting legal requirements.
• - Many interviewees pointed out that a paper is just a portal to the knowledge behind it; they don't necessarily need access to the paper if they can absorb the research itself.
• - ArXiv's proposed next step towards more open science includes offering HTML alongside existing PDF and TeX formats since HTML offers many benefits over PDF as an accessible format for scientific documents.

ArXiv is a website where people can read about science. Some people have trouble reading or seeing, so it's important for the website to be easy to use for everyone. This is called being accessible. Everyone benefits when things are accessible, and there are rules that say things should be accessible. Sometimes it's hard for people to find what they need on the website, but researchers who use special tools to help them read say that PDFs are the biggest problem. ArXiv wants to make their website more accessible by using a new format called HTML. Definitions 1. Accessible: Easy to use for everyone, including people with disabilities. 2. PDF: A type of file used for documents that can be hard for some people to read. 3. HTML: A type of code used to make websites that is easier for some people to use than PDFs.

Making Research More Accessible Through HTML

The research content hosted by arXiv is not fully accessible to everyone due to disabilities and other barriers. This issue is significant because a considerable proportion of people have reading and visual disabilities, and it is crucial for the scientific community that arXiv is as open as possible in order to advance science through wide and diverse participation. Moreover, there are mandates to become accessible, and accessible content benefits everyone.

The user journey table shows that most steps in accessing research were dominated by negative experiences, with only finding research being mostly positive. The highest number of comments was elicited by reading research followed by preparing documents. Researchers who rely on assistive technology point out PDF as the biggest stumbling block to accessible research. Participants who do not rely on assistive technology find it challenging to visualize accessing research in new ways that might break their current PDF-dependent workflow.

ArXiv's Role In Improving Accessibility

ArXiv has a role to play in improving the accessibility of research papers since it can have a powerful and immediate impact on making research more accessible. HTML is just one step towards a greater vision of accessibility since current accessibility standards are only a starting point for making things work for people with disabilities, which requires more than just meeting legal requirements.

Many interviewees pointed out that a paper is just a portal to the knowledge behind it; they don't necessarily need access to the paper if they can absorb the research itself. Therefore, arXiv's proposed next step towards more open science includes offering HTML alongside existing PDF and TeX formats since HTML offers many benefits over PDF as an accessible format for scientific documents.

• HTML Is Easier To Read:

HTML provides an easier way for readers with visual impairments or dyslexia to read text compared with traditional print media such as PDFs or books. It also allows users with cognitive impairments or learning difficulties access information without having difficulty navigating complex layouts found in print media.

• It’s More Flexible:

HTML offers flexibility when displaying information because it can be displayed across different devices such as computers, tablets, phones etc., whereas print media cannot be easily adapted between devices without losing its formatting or layout.

• It’s Easier To Navigate:

HTML makes navigation easier because users can quickly jump from one section of text/information directly into another using hyperlinks instead of having to scroll through pages manually like they would have had too when using print media such as books or PDFs.

• It’s Searchable :

Search engines are able index websites written in HTML much faster than those written in other formats such as PDFs which makes them easier for researchers looking for specific topics within large bodies of literature .

Conclusion

Arxiv's proposal next step towards more open science includes offering HTML alongside existing formats, including TeX, since HTML offers many benefits over other forms when considering accessibility. It's easier for readers with visual impairments or dyslexia, flexible across different devices, easy navigate via hyperlinks, searchable via search engines - all these features make researching much simpler. Ultimately this will help create an environment where everyone has equal access regardless of any physical limitations.