Offline Q-Learning on Diverse Multi-Task Data Both Scales And Generalizes
AI-generated Key Points
- Aviral Kumar and colleagues explore the potential of offline reinforcement learning (RL) to create agents that generalize broadly
- High-capacity models trained on large, heterogeneous datasets can lead to such agents, similar to advances in vision and NLP
- ResNets, cross-entropy based distributional backups, and feature normalization are appropriate choices for scaling up model capacity in offline Q-learning algorithms
- A single policy trained on 40 games with near-human performance using up-to 80 million parameter networks scales favorably with capacity
- Offline Q-learning scales similarly with model capacity compared to return-conditioned supervised approaches but has better performance when the dataset is suboptimal
- Offline Q-learning with a diverse dataset is sufficient to learn powerful representations which facilitate rapid transfer to novel games and fast online learning on new variations of a training game
- The authors' contributions are significant: AK conceived and led the project; RA discussed the experiment design and project direction; XG helped with design choices for some experiments; GT advised the project and ran baseline DT experiments; SL advised the project and provided valuable suggestions. All authors contributed to writing and editing the paper.
- This work demonstrates promising results for scaling up offline RL methods while maintaining strong generalization capabilities which could have implications for developing more robust AI systems that can learn from diverse datasets and transfer their knowledge to new tasks.
Authors: Aviral Kumar, Rishabh Agarwal, Xinyang Geng, George Tucker, Sergey Levine
Abstract: The potential of offline reinforcement learning (RL) is that high-capacity models trained on large, heterogeneous datasets can lead to agents that generalize broadly, analogously to similar advances in vision and NLP. However, recent works argue that offline RL methods encounter unique challenges to scaling up model capacity. Drawing on the learnings from these works, we re-examine previous design choices and find that with appropriate choices: ResNets, cross-entropy based distributional backups, and feature normalization, offline Q-learning algorithms exhibit strong performance that scales with model capacity. Using multi-task Atari as a testbed for scaling and generalization, we train a single policy on 40 games with near-human performance using up-to 80 million parameter networks, finding that model performance scales favorably with capacity. In contrast to prior work, we extrapolate beyond dataset performance even when trained entirely on a large (400M transitions) but highly suboptimal dataset (51% human-level performance). Compared to return-conditioned supervised approaches, offline Q-learning scales similarly with model capacity and has better performance, especially when the dataset is suboptimal. Finally, we show that offline Q-learning with a diverse dataset is sufficient to learn powerful representations that facilitate rapid transfer to novel games and fast online learning on new variations of a training game, improving over existing state-of-the-art representation learning approaches.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.