Do graph neural networks learn traditional jet substructure?

AI-generated keywords: ParticleNet Layerwise-Relevance Propagation Jet Tagging Jet Substructure Observables CERN LHC

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Jet tagging at the CERN LHC involves determining the origin of a jet based on its final-state particles
  • Machine learning techniques, specifically graph neural networks, are commonly used for jet tagging
  • The study focuses on understanding how ParticleNet, a state-of-the-art network for jet tagging, makes predictions
  • Layerwise-relevance propagation is used to identify relevant edge connections within the network
  • Changes in the distribution of relevant edges connecting subjets are observed during training
  • Signal jets originating from top quarks have a different edge distribution compared to background jets from lighter quarks and gluons
  • ParticleNet relies on traditional jet substructure observables when identifying jets (e.g., number of prongs or energetic particle clusters)
  • Understanding how graph neural networks learn traditional jet substructure can improve future algorithms in high-energy physics research.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Farouk Mokhtar, Raghav Kansal, Javier Duarte

5 pages, 4 figures. Accepted to Machine Learning for Physical Sciences NeurIPS 2022 workshop

Abstract: At the CERN LHC, the task of jet tagging, whose goal is to infer the origin of a jet given a set of final-state particles, is dominated by machine learning methods. Graph neural networks have been used to address this task by treating jets as point clouds with underlying, learnable, edge connections between the particles inside. We explore the decision-making process for one such state-of-the-art network, ParticleNet, by looking for relevant edge connections identified using the layerwise-relevance propagation technique. As the model is trained, we observe changes in the distribution of relevant edges connecting different intermediate clusters of particles, known as subjets. The resulting distribution of subjet connections is different for signal jets originating from top quarks, whose subjets typically correspond to its three decay products, and background jets originating from lighter quarks and gluons. This behavior indicates that the model is using traditional jet substructure observables, such as the number of prongs -- energetic particle clusters -- within a jet, when identifying jets.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Nov. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2211.09912v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of particle physics, the task of jet tagging at the CERN LHC involves determining the origin of a jet based on its final-state particles. This task is predominantly tackled using machine learning techniques. One such approach is the use of graph neural networks, which treat jets as point clouds with learnable edge connections between the constituent particles. In this study, the authors focus on understanding the decision-making process of ParticleNet, a state-of-the-art network for jet tagging. To gain insights into how ParticleNet makes its predictions, the researchers employ a technique called layerwise-relevance propagation. This method helps identify relevant edge connections within the network. By analyzing these connections, they observe changes in their distribution as the model undergoes training. Specifically, they find that there are distinct patterns in the distribution of relevant edges connecting intermediate clusters of particles known as subjets. Signal jets originating from top quarks exhibit a different distribution compared to background jets originating from lighter quarks and gluons. This discrepancy suggests that ParticleNet relies on traditional jet substructure observables when identifying jets. Traditional jet substructure observables refer to characteristics such as the number of prongs or energetic particle clusters within a jet. These observables provide information about how a jet was formed and can be used to distinguish between different types of jets. Overall, this study sheds light on how graph neural networks like ParticleNet learn traditional jet substructure and utilize it in their decision-making process for jet tagging tasks at CERN's LHC. The findings contribute to our understanding of machine learning methods in high-energy physics research and may have implications for improving future algorithms in this domain.
Created on 15 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.