## A constant lower bound for the union-closed sets conjecture

### AI-generated Key Points

- The union-closed sets conjecture is a longstanding open problem in combinatorics.
- The authors provide a constant lower bound for the conjecture, improving upon previous bounds.
- For any union-closed family $\mathcal{F} \subseteq 2^{[n]}, \mathcal{F} \neq \{\emptyset\}$, there exists an $i \in [n]$ which is contained in a $0.01$ fraction of the sets in $\mathcal{F}$.
- The authors introduce a lemma that provides an upper bound on the entropy of a set given its frequency within a family.
- They use this lemma to prove their main result by showing that if $A$ and $B$ are independent samples from a distribution over subsets of $[n]$ such that $Pr[i \in A] < 0.01$ for all $i$ and $H(A) > 0$, then $H(A \cup B) > H(A)$.
- The authors suggest studying the KL-divergence between distributions as a way to quantify how far from uniform the distribution of $A\cup B$ may be when $Pr[i\in A]$ is close to $\frac12$.
- They propose Conjecture 1 as a possible path towards resolving the union-closed sets conjecture: Let A, B be iid samples from a distribution over a family of subsets of [n]. Assume that P r[i ∈ A] < 0.5 for all i, and H(A) > 0. Then H(A ∪ B) + D(A ∪ B||A) > H(A).
- This paper provides new insights into potential directions for future research on union-closed families.

**Authors:**
Justin Gilmer

**Abstract:** We show that for any union-closed family $\mathcal{F} \subseteq 2^{[n]}, \mathcal{F} \neq \{\emptyset\}$, there exists an $i \in [n]$ which is contained in a $0.01$ fraction of the sets in $\mathcal{F}$. This is the first known constant lower bound, and improves upon the $\Omega(\log_2(|\mathcal{F}|)^{-1})$ bounds of Knill and W\'{o}jick. Our result follows from an information theoretic strengthening of the conjecture. Specifically, we show that if $A, B$ are independent samples from a distribution over subsets of $[n]$ such that $Pr[i \in A] < 0.01$ for all $i$ and $H(A) > 0$, then $H(A \cup B) > H(A)$.

### Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

**Why do we need votes?**

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

## Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation**Look for similar papers (in beta version)**

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

**Disclaimer:** The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.