CAMEMBERT: A Mini-Neptunes GCM Intercomparison, Protocol Version 1.0. A CUISINES Model Intercomparison Project
AI-generated Key Points
- Mini-Neptunes are important to study in exoplanetary science
- CAMEMBERT project is an intercomparison of general circulation models (GCMs) used to simulate mini-Neptunes' atmospheres
- Protocol focuses on two well-studied targets: warm GJ~1214b and cooler K2-18b
- Three cases considered for each target covering a range of complexities and configurations where differences exist between GCMs in the literature
- Eight GCMs are currently participating, but membership remains open for those interested in participating
- Results of this intercomparison will be presented in future papers under CUISINES (Climates Using Interactive Suites of Intercomparisons Nested for Exoplanet Studies)
- The success of previous projects like TRAPPIST-1 Habitable Atmosphere Intercomparison (THAI) highlights the value of such intercomparisons.
- The CAMEMBERT project will provide valuable insights into the uncertainties associated with these models and help improve our ability to interpret observations of exoplanets.
Authors: Duncan A. Christie, Elspeth K. H. Lee, Hamish Innes, Pascal A. Noti, Benjamin Charnay, Thomas J. Fauchez, Nathan J. Mayne, Russell Deitrick, Feng Ding, Jennifer J. Greco, Mark Hammond, Isaac Malsky, Avi Mandell, Emily Rauscher, Michael T. Roman, Denis E. Sergeev, Linda Sohl, Maria E. Steinrueck, Martin Turbet, Eric T. Wolf, Maria Zamyatina, Ludmila Carone
Abstract: With an increased focus on the observing and modelling of mini-Neptunes, there comes a need to better understand the tools we use to model their atmospheres. In this paper, we present the protocol for the CAMEMBERT (Comparing Atmospheric Models of Extrasolar Mini-neptunes Building and Envisioning Retrievals and Transits) project, an intercomparison of general circulation models (GCMs) used by the exoplanetary science community to simulate the atmospheres of mini-Neptunes. We focus on two targets well studied both observationally and theoretically with planned JWST Cycle 1 observations: the warm GJ~1214b and the cooler K2-18b. For each target, we consider a temperature-forced case, a clear sky dual-grey radiative transfer case, and a clear sky multi band radiative transfer case, covering a range of complexities and configurations where we know differences exist between GCMs in the literature. This paper presents all the details necessary to participate in the intercomparison, with the intention of presenting the results in future papers. Currently, there are eight GCMs participating (ExoCAM, Exo-FMS, FMS PCM, Generic PCM, MITgcm, RM-GCM, THOR, and the UM), and membership in the project remains open. Those interested in participating are invited to contact the authors.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.