Spam Review Detection Using Deep Learning

AI-generated keywords: Spam Review Detection Machine Learning Deep Learning Natural Language Processing Psycholinguistic Features

AI-generated Key Points

  • Online shopping is popular due to its convenience, but fake reviews can mislead customers.
  • A reliable system for detecting spam reviews is needed.
  • Machine learning techniques have been introduced to solve the problem of spam review detection.
  • Traditional machine learning classifiers such as Nave Bayes (NB), K Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) have been applied to detect spam reviews.
  • Deep learning methods such as Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) have also been proposed for spam review detection.
  • Previous studies attempted to mine and summarize all customer reviews of a product using natural language processing methods.
  • Some researchers incorporated sentiment analysis or added psycholinguistic features in their models to improve performance in detecting fake or spam reviews.
  • A hybrid approach was proposed that detected duplicate reviews first before creating a hybrid dataset with the help of active learning.
  • Various CNN architectures composed of Topic Categorization tasks and Sentiment Analysis on various classification datasets were evaluated by researchers who achieved very good performance.
  • In the first phase of the proposed model, a dataset of gold-standard deceptive opinion spam was produced using crowdsourcing through Amazon Mechanical Turk.
  • Detecting spam reviews remains a critical issue in making online reviews reliable.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: G. M. Shahariar, Swapnil Biswas, Faiza Omar, Faisal Muhammad Shah, Samiha Binte Hassan

2019 IEEE 10th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON). IEEE, 2019
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: A robust and reliable system of detecting spam reviews is a crying need in todays world in order to purchase products without being cheated from online sites. In many online sites, there are options for posting reviews, and thus creating scopes for fake paid reviews or untruthful reviews. These concocted reviews can mislead the general public and put them in a perplexity whether to believe the review or not. Prominent machine learning techniques have been introduced to solve the problem of spam review detection. The majority of current research has concentrated on supervised learning methods, which require labeled data - an inadequacy when it comes to online review. Our focus in this article is to detect any deceptive text reviews. In order to achieve that we have worked with both labeled and unlabeled data and proposed deep learning methods for spam review detection which includes Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and a variant of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) that is Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). We have also applied some traditional machine learning classifiers such as Nave Bayes (NB), K Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) to detect spam reviews and finally, we have shown the performance comparison for both traditional and deep learning classifiers.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Nov. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2211.01675v1

In today's world, online shopping has become a regular thing for most people as it saves time and effort. However, one of the drawbacks of online purchasing is the prevalence of fake reviews or spam reviews that can mislead customers into making wrong decisions. To address this issue, a robust and reliable system for detecting spam reviews is needed. Prominent machine learning techniques have been introduced to solve the problem of spam review detection. The majority of current research has concentrated on supervised learning methods, which require labeled data - an inadequacy when it comes to online review. In this article, the focus is on detecting any deceptive text reviews using both labeled and unlabeled data. To achieve this goal, deep learning methods such as Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and a variant of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) called Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) have been proposed for spam review detection. Traditional machine learning classifiers such as Nave Bayes (NB), K Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) have also been applied to detect spam reviews. Finally, performance comparison for both traditional and deep learning classifiers has been shown. Previous studies have attempted to mine and summarize all customer reviews of a product using natural language processing methods. Some authors classified spam reviews into three categories: non-reviews, brand-only reviews, and untruthful reviews while others used supervised learning and manually labeled reviews crawled from Epinions to detect product review spam. In addition to these approaches, some researchers incorporated sentiment analysis or added psycholinguistic features in their models to improve performance in detecting fake or spam reviews. A hybrid approach was also proposed that detected duplicate reviews first before creating a hybrid dataset with the help of active learning. Various CNN architectures composed of Topic Categorization tasks and Sentiment Analysis on various classification datasets were evaluated by researchers who achieved very good performance. Semantic clustering was introduced by adding an additional layer in the CNN architecture, and an efficient bag-of-words representation for input data was used to reduce the number of parameters for the network. In the first phase of the proposed model, a dataset of gold-standard deceptive opinion spam was produced using crowdsourcing through Amazon Mechanical Turk. Although part-of-speech n-gram features give a fairly good prediction on whether an individual review is fake, the classifier actually performed slightly better when psycholinguistic features were added to the model. Overall, detecting spam reviews remains a critical issue in making online reviews reliable.
Created on 17 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.