Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2211.00241v4

In their paper titled "Adversarial Policies Beat Superhuman Go AIs," authors Tony T. Wang, Adam Gleave, Tom Tseng, Kellin Pelrine, Nora Belrose, Joseph Miller, Michael D. Dennis, Yawen Duan, Viktor Pogrebniak, Sergey Levine and Stuart Russell present a groundbreaking attack on the state-of-the-art Go-playing AI system KataGo. By training adversarial policies against KataGo they achieve an impressive win rate of over 97% against KataGo running at superhuman settings. The adversaries do not win by playing Go well themselves but rather employ clever strategies to trick KataGo into making serious blunders. Remarkably this attack transfers zero-shot to other superhuman Go-playing AIs as well and is comprehensible enough for human experts to implement it without algorithmic assistance and consistently beat superhuman AIs. Furthermore the core vulnerability uncovered by this attack persists even in KataGo agents that have been adversarially trained to defend against it; highlighting the surprising failure modes that even superhuman AI systems may harbor. The authors provide example games on their website (https://goattack.far.ai/) to demonstrate the effectiveness of their attack and its implications for the field of AI and game-playing algorithms are significant. This paper has been accepted for presentation at ICML 2023 with a changelog included in its final version; showcasing the authors' diverse expertise and collaboration which contribute to the credibility and depth of their findings in challenging existing AI systems in complex domains like Go.

• - Authors present a groundbreaking attack on the Go-playing AI system KataGo
• - Achieve an impressive win rate of over 97% against KataGo running at superhuman settings
• - Adversaries employ clever strategies to trick KataGo into making serious blunders
• - Attack transfers zero-shot to other superhuman Go-playing AIs
• - Comprehensible enough for human experts to implement without algorithmic assistance and consistently beat superhuman AIs
• - Core vulnerability uncovered by this attack persists even in adversarially trained KataGo agents
• - Example games provided on their website to demonstrate the effectiveness of the attack
• - Implications for the field of AI and game-playing algorithms are significant

Summary1. The authors found a way to trick a computer program called KataGo that plays the game of Go. 2. They were able to win against KataGo most of the time, even when it was set to be really good at the game. 3. Other people can use these tricks to make other computer programs that play Go lose too. 4. Even if KataGo is trained to be better at playing against tricks, it still has a weakness that can be exploited. 5. This discovery is important for the field of artificial intelligence and game-playing algorithms. Definitions- AI: Artificial Intelligence - Computer programs that can think and learn like humans. - Go: A strategy board game played between two players who take turns placing black or white stones on a grid. - Adversaries: People who try to defeat or trick something or someone. - Blunders: Serious mistakes or errors. - Zero-shot: Without any prior training or knowledge. - Superhuman: Better than what humans are capable of doing.

Adversarial Policies Beat Superhuman Go AIs: An In-Depth Look at the Groundbreaking Research of Tony T. Wang, Adam Gleave, Tom Tseng, Kellin Pelrine, Nora Belrose, Joseph Miller, Michael D. Dennis, Yawen Duan, Viktor Pogrebniak, Sergey Levine and Stuart Russell

Go is an ancient Chinese board game with a long history and complex rules. It has been used to challenge AI algorithms for decades due to its complexity and strategic depth. Recently however a team of researchers led by Tony T. Wang have made a breakthrough in this field by developing an attack on the state-of-the-art Go-playing AI system KataGo that achieves an impressive win rate of over 97% against KataGo running at superhuman settings. This paper titled "Adversarial Policies Beat Superhuman Go AIs" has been accepted for presentation at ICML 2023 with a changelog included in its final version; showcasing the authors' diverse expertise and collaboration which contribute to the credibility and depth of their findings in challenging existing AI systems in complex domains like Go.

The Adversarial Attack

The attack developed by Wang et al relies on training adversarial policies against KataGo instead of playing Go well themselves. These adversaries employ clever strategies to trick KataGo into making serious blunders resulting in an impressive win rate against superhuman AIs when employed correctly. Remarkably this attack transfers zero-shot to other superhuman Go-playing AIs as well and is comprehensible enough for human experts to implement it without algorithmic assistance and consistently beat superhuman AIs; highlighting the surprising failure modes that even superhuman AI systems may harbor despite their sophistication level. The authors provide example games on their website (https://goattack.far.ai/) to demonstrate the effectiveness of their attack as well as its implications for the field of AI and game-playing algorithms more generally

Implications

This research has significant implications for both artificial intelligence research as well as game theory more broadly speaking since it demonstrates how even sophisticated agents can be vulnerable if they are not trained properly or do not take into account all possible scenarios when making decisions within complex environments such as those found in board games like Go or Chess where there are multiple layers of strategy involved beyond just simple moves or calculations based on probability alone . Furthermore this work also highlights how important it is for developers creating these types of algorithms to consider potential vulnerabilities before releasing them into production so that they can be better protected from malicious actors who might try exploiting them using similar techniques outlined here by Wang et al.. Finally this research also provides insight into how humans can still outsmart machines even when given limited information about what exactly those machines are doing internally - something which could prove invaluable when trying develop better defenses against future generations of artificially intelligent agents!