Rogue Protocol: A Framework For NFT Royalties Tokenisation
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The crypto ecosystem is popular for raising venture capital through different investment vehicles such as ICOs, DAOs, and NFTs.
- Investor protection is a crucial aspect of efficient capital markets that has been overlooked by many projects focused solely on marketing to attract new investors without generating any economic revenue.
- Regulators have taken a strict approach to the ecosystem and deemed certain tokens as securities when they were not intended to be.
- Cryptocurrencies that exhibit truly decentralized activity like Ethereum have been granted exceptions by regulators such as the SEC in their interpretation of the Howey test for digital assets.
- A system that automatically directs project revenue to a treasury pool and computes token prices using predetermined bonding curves would efficiently raise capital while providing automatic guarantees of fair participation for investors in project success.
- NFT royalties are an excellent example of decentralized economic activity generating cash flows used to back associated tokens.
- The authors propose a cryptographic system called Rogue Protocol for NFT royalties tokenization that ties token prices to the success of decentralized activities while ensuring fair distribution and rewarding founders and participants according to their risk-taking levels.
- The proposed framework addresses investor protection issues in cryptocurrency ecosystems while promoting value creation over hype-based marketing strategies.
Authors: Šarūnas Barauskas, Roberto Ripamonti, Emanuele Ragnoli
Abstract: The crypto ecosystem has evolved into a formidable channel for raising venture capital. Each new wave of capital inflows has been epitomized by a new type of investment vehicle, may it be ICOs, DAOs, or NFTs. Regrettably, none of these paradigms tried to address the issue of investor protection, a pillar of efficient capital markets. Moreover, very few projects tried to generate economic revenue, focusing instead on marketing alone to attract new investors. Without revenues, price discovery was impossible, while investors were left without any protection against rug pulls. This has forced regulators to take a hard-line approach to the ecosystem, and rule that certain tokens are securities when they are not intended to be. Regulators have left the door open to cryptocurrencies with truly decentralised activity like Ethereum, most notably the SEC in its interpretation of the Howey test for digital assets. We believe that a great number of decentralised projects could benefit from this regulatory exception. A system where project revenue is automatically directed to a treasury pool, and the price of tokens is computed following a predetermined bonding curve, would allow to efficiently raise capital, while investors would have automatic guarantees of fair participation in the success of the project. Such a framework would incentivise founders to design decentralised projects that create value instead of hype, while making the application of securities laws less stringent or even needed. NFT royalties in particular are an example of decentralised economic activity that generates cash flows, used to back the value of associated tokens. We propose a cryptographic system that ties the price of tokens to the success of a decentralised activity, guarantees the fair distribution of tokens, and rewards founders and participants in the system in line with the amount of risk they are taking.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.