TRAPUM upper limits on pulsed radio emission for SMC X-ray pulsar J0058-7218

AI-generated keywords: TRAPUM

AI-generated Key Points

  • TRAPUM collaboration used MeerKAT telescope to search for pulsed radio emission from the Small Magellanic Cloud pulsar J0058-7218
  • No significant detection of dispersed, pulsed radio emission was found in three 2-hour L-band observations using core dishes of MeerKAT
  • Upper limit of 7.0 μJy on mean flux density at 1284 MHz was set, which is nearly 7 times deeper than previous radio searches for this pulsar in Parkes L-band observations
  • Pulsar search was run on all three observations of the Pulsar Wind Nebula (PWN) as part of standard processing used in the TRAPUM SMC survey
  • Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) cleaning was performed with a combination of iqrm, presto's rfifind, and data10
  • Handful of candidates were found in the beam for each observation that were consistent with RFI or noise
  • No periodic signals were found at PSR J0058-7218's period during inspection of original peasoup candidates files
  • Study suggests that either PSR J0058−7218's radio emission is not beamed towards Earth or it has very low radio efficiency similar to handful Pulsar Wind Nebulae systems such as PSR B0540−6919
  • No bright dispersed single radio pulses found above fluence 93 mJy ms at 1284 MHz during this search
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: E. Carli, L. Levin, B. W. Stappers, E. D. Barr, R. P. Breton, S. Buchner, M. Burgay, M. Kramer, P. V. Padmanabh, A. Possenti, V. Venkatraman Krishnan, J. Behrend, D. J. Champion, W. Chen, Y. P. Men

arXiv: 2210.04785v1 - DOI (astro-ph.HE)
7 pages, 2 figures, 1 table. Accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: The TRAPUM collaboration has used the MeerKAT telescope to conduct a search for pulsed radio emission from the young Small Magellanic Cloud pulsar J0058-7218 located in the supernova remnant IKT 16, following its discovery in X-rays with XMM-Newton. We report no significant detection of dispersed, pulsed radio emission from this source in three 2-hour L-band observations using the core dishes of MeerKAT, setting an upper limit of 7.0 {\mu}Jy on its mean flux density at 1284 MHz. This is nearly 7 times deeper than previous radio searches for this pulsar in Parkes L-band observations. This suggests that the radio emission of PSR J0058-7218 is not beamed towards Earth or that PSR J0058-7218 is similar to a handful of Pulsar Wind Nebulae systems that have a very low radio efficiency, such as PSR B0540-6919, the Large Magellanic Cloud Crab pulsar analogue. We have also searched for bright, dispersed, single radio pulses and found no candidates above a fluence of 93 mJy ms at 1284 MHz.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Oct. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2210.04785v1

The TRAPUM collaboration has conducted a pulsar search using the MeerKAT telescope to detect pulsed radio emission from the young Small Magellanic Cloud pulsar J0058-7218 located in the supernova remnant IKT 16. This was done following its discovery in X-rays with XMM-Newton. The team reports no significant detection of dispersed, pulsed radio emission from this source in three 2-hour L-band observations using the core dishes of MeerKAT, setting an upper limit of 7.0 {\mu}Jy on its mean flux density at 1284 MHz. This is nearly 7 times deeper than previous radio searches for this pulsar in Parkes L-band observations. As part of the standard processing used in the TRAPUM SMC survey, a pulsar search was run on all three observations of the Pulsar Wind Nebula (PWN). Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) cleaning was performed with a combination of iqrm, presto's rfifind, and data10. The folds were searched for the highest S/N profile over a so-called 'natural' range around the candidate period, period derivative, DM, and acceleration. The folded candidates were then partially classified with pics based on Machine Learning. The team used a minimum score of 10 per cent pulsar-like for both the original and TRAPUM training sets as well as a minimum folded S/N of 7. This returned a handful of candidates in the beam for each observation that were consistent with RFI or noise. The original peasoup candidates files were inspected in case any periodic signals were lost during sifting or had lower spectral S/N than our folding cut-off but no periodic signals were found at PSR J0058-7218's period. The discovery of PSR J0058-7218 was published after full resolution data for OBS1 were deleted. The team used the ephemeris provided to fold a downsampled OBS1 and the full resolution OBS2 and OBS3 with dspsr. The folded data were cleaned with presto's rfifind frequency channel mask from the full resolution data, clfd, and psrchive. They then searched for the highest S/N profile in the folded data with psrchive's pdmp tool up to a DM of 500 pc cm−3, with a period range of ±1 μs. The team also ran folding searches up to a DM of 1000 pc cm−3 with pulsarX's psrfold_fil on the downsampled data from OBS1 and the full resolution OBS2 and OBS3 data. They applied an rfifind frequency channel mask from the full resolution data; psrfold_fil cleansed the full resolution data before folding and applies clfd on folded data. The folds were searched for highest S/N profile over so called 'natural' range around ephemeris predicted topocentric spin frequency . In conclusion , this study suggests that either PSR J0058−7218's radio emission is not beamed towards Earth or that it is similar to handful Pulsar Wind Nebulae systems that have very low radio efficiency , such as PSR B0540−6919 which known as Large Magellanic Cloud Crab pulsar analogue . Additionally , no bright dispersed single radio pulses found above fluence 93 mJy ms at 1284 MHz during this search .
Created on 11 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.