GoalsEye: Learning High Speed Precision Table Tennis on a Physical Robot
AI-generated Key Points
- Learning goal conditioned control in the real world is a challenging problem in robotics
- Reinforcement learning systems have potential but are often too costly for real-world deployment
- Imitation learning approaches require curated demonstration data and lack continuous improvement mechanisms
- Iterative imitation techniques can learn goal-directed control from undirected demonstration data and improve continuously via self-supervised goal reaching
- Results so far have been limited to simulated environments, but this study shows iterative imitation learning can scale to goal-directed behavior on a real robot in high-speed precision table tennis
- The approach offers a straightforward way to do continuous on-robot learning without complexities such as reward design or sim-to-real transfer, and is sample efficient enough to train on a physical robot in just a few hours
- The resulting policy can perform on par or better than amateur humans at the task of returning the ball to specific targets on the table, with an improvement of 3.4% for balls landed within 30cm and 3.6% for balls landed within 20cm over average human performance
- The study demonstrates that iterative imitation learning can continuously improve in the real world beyond an initial undirected bootstrap dataset, sidestepping the complexities of reinforcement learning (e.g., exploration, reward shaping and sim-to-real transfer) and excel at dynamic tasks requiring precision
Authors: Tianli Ding, Laura Graesser, Saminda Abeyruwan, David B. D'Ambrosio, Anish Shankar, Pierre Sermanet, Pannag R. Sanketi, Corey Lynch
Abstract: Learning goal conditioned control in the real world is a challenging open problem in robotics. Reinforcement learning systems have the potential to learn autonomously via trial-and-error, but in practice the costs of manual reward design, ensuring safe exploration, and hyperparameter tuning are often enough to preclude real world deployment. Imitation learning approaches, on the other hand, offer a simple way to learn control in the real world, but typically require costly curated demonstration data and lack a mechanism for continuous improvement. Recently, iterative imitation techniques have been shown to learn goal directed control from undirected demonstration data, and improve continuously via self-supervised goal reaching, but results thus far have been limited to simulated environments. In this work, we present evidence that iterative imitation learning can scale to goal-directed behavior on a real robot in a dynamic setting: high speed, precision table tennis (e.g. "land the ball on this particular target"). We find that this approach offers a straightforward way to do continuous on-robot learning, without complexities such as reward design or sim-to-real transfer. It is also scalable -- sample efficient enough to train on a physical robot in just a few hours. In real world evaluations, we find that the resulting policy can perform on par or better than amateur humans (with players sampled randomly from a robotics lab) at the task of returning the ball to specific targets on the table. Finally, we analyze the effect of an initial undirected bootstrap dataset size on performance, finding that a modest amount of unstructured demonstration data provided up-front drastically speeds up the convergence of a general purpose goal-reaching policy. See https://sites.google.com/view/goals-eye for videos.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.