## Hierarchical Sliced Wasserstein Distance

### AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

- The Hierarchical Sliced Wasserstein (HSW) distance is a new metric between measures proposed in a recent paper.
- The sliced Wasserstein (SW) distance has been widely used in various application scenarios due to its ability to scale to a large number of supports without suffering from the curse of dimensionality.
- However, estimating the sliced Wasserstein requires a relatively large number of projections in high-dimensional settings, which becomes the main computational bottleneck for applications where the number of supports is relatively small compared with the dimension.
- To address this issue, the authors propose deriving projections by linearly and randomly combining a smaller number of projections called bottleneck projections.
- They explain how these projections are used by introducing Hierarchical Radon Transform (HRT), which is constructed by applying Radon Transform variants recursively.
- The approach is formulated into the new metric between measures named HSW distance.
- By proving the injectivity of HRT, they derive the metricity of HSW and investigate its theoretical properties including its connection to SW variants and its computational and sample complexities.
- Finally, they compare the computational cost and generative quality of HSW with conventional SW on deep generative modeling tasks using various benchmark datasets such as CIFAR10, CelebA, and Tiny ImageNet.
- Their work provides an efficient way to estimate SW distances in high-dimensional settings that can benefit many applications such as deep learning models that use mini-batch approaches.

**Authors:**
Khai Nguyen,
Tongzheng Ren,
Huy Nguyen,
Litu Rout,
Tan Nguyen,
Nhat Ho

**Abstract:** Sliced Wasserstein (SW) distance has been widely used in different application scenarios since it can be scaled to a large number of supports without suffering from the curse of dimensionality. The value of sliced Wasserstein distance is the average of transportation cost between one-dimensional representations (projections) of original measures that are obtained by Radon Transform (RT). Despite its efficiency in the number of supports, estimating the sliced Wasserstein requires a relatively large number of projections in high-dimensional settings. Therefore, for applications where the number of supports is relatively small compared with the dimension, e.g., several deep learning applications where the mini-batch approaches are utilized, the complexities from matrix multiplication of Radon Transform become the main computational bottleneck. To address this issue, we propose to derive projections by linearly and randomly combining a smaller number of projections which are named bottleneck projections. We explain the usage of these projections by introducing Hierarchical Radon Transform (HRT) which is constructed by applying Radon Transform variants recursively. We then formulate the approach into a new metric between measures, named Hierarchical Sliced Wasserstein (HSW) distance. By proving the injectivity of HRT, we derive the metricity of HSW. Moreover, we investigate the theoretical properties of HSW including its connection to SW variants and its computational and sample complexities. Finally, we compare the computational cost and generative quality of HSW with the conventional SW on the task of deep generative modeling using various benchmark datasets including CIFAR10, CelebA, and Tiny ImageNet.

### Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

**Why do we need votes?**

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

## Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation**Look for similar papers (in beta version)**

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

**Disclaimer:** The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.