What Do Children and Parents Want and Perceive in Conversational Agents? Towards Transparent, Trustworthy, Democratized Agents

AI-generated keywords: Conversational Agents Children Parents Trust Design

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Historical focus on analyzing technology from a WEIRD adult perspective
  • Broadening the perspective by analyzing viewpoints of children and parents from various countries regarding conversational agents
  • Empowering children and parents to program their own agents through educational workshops
  • Children perceived agents as more human-like, warm, and dependable compared to parents' views
  • Participants trusted agents more than parents or friends for accurate information
  • Children described ideal agents as more artificial than human-like, prioritizing fun features and approachable characteristics
  • Implications for agent design: focus on indicators of competence and predictability, increase transparency about information sources
  • Importance of considering diverse perspectives when designing technologies like conversational agents
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jessica Van Brummelen, Maura Kelleher, Mingyan Claire Tian, Nghi Hoang Nguyen

18 pages, 9 figures, submitted to IDC 2023, for associated appendix: https://gist.github.com/jessvb/fa1d4c75910106d730d194ffd4d725d3

Abstract: Historically, researchers have focused on analyzing WEIRD, adult perspectives on technology. This means we may not have technology developed appropriately for children and those from non-WEIRD countries. In this paper, we analyze children and parents from various countries' perspectives on an emerging technology: conversational agents. We aim to better understand participants' trust of agents, partner models, and their ideas of "ideal future agents" such that researchers can better design for these users. Additionally, we empower children and parents to program their own agents through educational workshops, and present changes in perceptions as participants create and learn about agents. Results from the study (n=49) included how children felt agents were significantly more human-like, warm, and dependable than parents did, how participants trusted agents more than parents or friends for correct information, how children described their ideal agents as being more artificial than human-like than parents did, and how children tended to focus more on fun features, approachable/friendly features and addressing concerns through agent design than parents did, among other results. We also discuss potential agent design implications of the results, including how designers may be able to best foster appropriate levels of trust towards agents by focusing on designing agents' competence and predictability indicators, as well as increasing transparency in terms of agents' information sources.

Submitted to arXiv on 16 Sep. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2209.07862v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their study "What Do Children and Parents Want and Perceive in Conversational Agents? Towards Transparent, Trustworthy, Democratized Agents," authors Jessica Van Brummelen, Maura Kelleher, Mingyan Claire Tian, and Nghi Hoang Nguyen address the historical focus on analyzing technology from a WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic) adult perspective. This limited approach may result in technology that is not appropriately developed for children or individuals from non-WEIRD countries. The researchers aimed to broaden this perspective by analyzing the viewpoints of children and parents from various countries regarding conversational agents. By understanding participants' trust in agents, partner models, and their ideas of "ideal future agents," the study sought to inform better design practices for these users. Additionally, the researchers empowered children and parents to program their own agents through educational workshops to observe changes in perceptions as participants engaged with and learned about agents. The results of the study involving 49 participants revealed interesting insights. Children perceived agents as significantly more human-like, warm, and dependable compared to how parents viewed them. Participants trusted agents more than they trusted parents or friends for accurate information. Children described their ideal agents as being more artificial than human-like in contrast to parents' perspectives. Moreover, children tended to prioritize fun features, approachable/friendly characteristics, and addressing concerns through agent design more than parents did. The study also discussed potential implications for agent design based on the findings. Designers may enhance levels of trust towards agents by focusing on developing indicators of competence and predictability within the agents while also increasing transparency regarding the sources of information utilized by these conversational agents. Overall,this research sheds light on the importance of considering diverse perspectives when designing technologies like conversational agents.By incorporating insights from both children and parents across different cultural backgrounds,designers can create more transparent, trustworthy, and democratized agent models that cater to a broader range of users effectively.
Created on 17 May. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.