Will You Participate? Exploring the Potential of Robotics Competitions on Human-centric Topics

AI-generated keywords: Robotics Competitions Human-centric Topics Safety Privacy Explainability

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors Yuchong Zhang, Miguel Vasco, Mårten Björkman, and Danica Kragic present their paper titled "Will You Participate? Exploring the Potential of Robotics Competitions on Human-centric Topics"
  • The study focuses on robotics competitions addressing four human-centric topics: safety, privacy, explainability, and federated learning
  • Mainstream robotic researchers prioritize safety and explainability over privacy and federated learning
  • Researchers show a strong willingness to invest further in research related to safety and explainability
  • Privacy and federated learning are perceived as receiving less attention within the robotics community
  • Participants lack enthusiasm for engaging in competitions related to privacy and federated learning
  • Authors recommend targeting other communities such as the machine learning community for future competitions focusing on these human-centric topics
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yuchong Zhang, Miguel Vasco, Mårten Björkman, Danica Kragic

International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCII) 2024
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: This paper presents findings from an exploratory needfinding study investigating the research current status and potential participation of the competitions on the robotics community towards four human-centric topics: safety, privacy, explainability, and federated learning. We conducted a survey with 34 participants across three distinguished European robotics consortia, nearly 60% of whom possessed over five years of research experience in robotics. Our qualitative and quantitative analysis revealed that current mainstream robotic researchers prioritize safety and explainability, expressing a greater willingness to invest in further research in these areas. Conversely, our results indicate that privacy and federated learning garner less attention and are perceived to have lower potential. Additionally, the study suggests a lack of enthusiasm within the robotics community for participating in competitions related to these topics. Based on these findings, we recommend targeting other communities, such as the machine learning community, for future competitions related to these four human-centric topics.

Submitted to arXiv on 27 Mar. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2403.18616v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Authors Yuchong Zhang, Miguel Vasco, Mårten Björkman, and Danica Kragic present their paper titled "Will You Participate? Exploring the Potential of Robotics Competitions on Human-centric Topics," which delves into the current status and potential participation of robotics competitions in addressing four human-centric topics: safety, privacy, explainability, and federated learning. The study involved a survey with 34 participants from three prominent European robotics consortia, with a majority possessing over five years of research experience in robotics. Through qualitative and quantitative analysis, the researchers found that mainstream robotic researchers prioritize safety and explainability, showing a strong willingness to invest further in research within these areas. Conversely, privacy and federated learning were identified as receiving less attention and being perceived as having lower potential within the robotics community. Additionally, there was a lack of enthusiasm among participants for engaging in competitions related to these topics. Based on their findings, the authors recommend targeting other communities such as the machine learning community for future competitions focusing on these four human-centric topics. This study sheds light on the preferences and priorities of robotic researchers regarding key issues in the field and suggests avenues for expanding collaboration and innovation across different research communities.
Created on 03 Feb. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.