Are Deep Learning-Generated Social Media Profiles Indistinguishable from Real Profiles?

AI-generated keywords: Deep Learning Photorealistic Images AI-Generated Content Detection Methods Awareness

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Deep learning methods can create near photorealistic images and humanlike text that is difficult to distinguish from real content
  • Concerns have been raised about the use of these techniques to produce fake social media profiles and posts
  • An experiment was conducted with 375 participants in a simulated social media feed to test this hypothesis
  • Results showed that detecting fake generated content is extremely challenging for the average user, even fully-generated fake profiles with posts written by advanced text generators were hard to identify as fake
  • Improved detection methods and increased awareness among users about potential AI-generated content on social media platforms are needed
  • The paper has been accepted for presentation at the upcoming 56th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-56)
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Sippo Rossi, Youngjin Kwon, Odd Harald Auglend, Raghava Rao Mukkamala, Matti Rossi, Jason Thatcher

This paper has been accepted for the upcoming 56th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-56)

Abstract: In recent years, deep learning methods have become increasingly capable of generating near photorealistic pictures and humanlike text up to the point that humans can no longer recognize what is real and what is AI-generated. Concerningly, there is evidence that some of these methods have already been adopted to produce fake social media profiles and content. We hypothesize that these advances have made detecting generated fake social media content in the feed extremely difficult, if not impossible, for the average user of social media. This paper presents the results of an experiment where 375 participants attempted to label real and generated profiles and posts in a simulated social media feed. The results support our hypothesis and suggest that even fully-generated fake profiles with posts written by an advanced text generator are difficult for humans to identify.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Sep. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2209.07214v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The rise of deep learning methods has enabled the creation of near photorealistic images and humanlike text that can be difficult for humans to distinguish from real content. This has raised concerns that these techniques may be used to produce fake social media profiles and posts. To test this hypothesis, an experiment was conducted with 375 participants in a simulated social media feed. The results confirmed that detecting fake generated content is extremely challenging for the average user. Even fully-generated fake profiles with posts written by advanced text generators were hard to identify as fake. These findings emphasize the need for improved detection methods and increased awareness among users about potential AI-generated content on social media platforms. The paper has been accepted for presentation at the upcoming 56th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-56).
Created on 13 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.