Do Androids Laugh at Electric Sheep? Humor "Understanding" Benchmarks from The New Yorker Caption Contest

AI-generated keywords: New Yorker Caption Contest AI models sophisticated humor vision-and-language models language-only models

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The New Yorker Caption Contest is known for sophisticated and nuanced humor
  • Humor often involves unexpected relationships between images and captions
  • Allusions to a wide range of human experiences are common
  • A team of researchers developed three tasks to challenge AI models to understand this type of humor
  • Tasks require grasping complex relationships and allusions in both vision-and-language models and language-only models
  • The team publicly releases their corpora with rich annotations for cartoon images, aiding future research in this area
  • Despite resources provided, there are still performance gaps between high-quality machine learning models and humans.
  • Authors include Jack Hessel, Ana Marasović, Jena D. Hwang, Lillian Lee, Jeff Da, Rowan Zellers, Robert Mankoff and Yejin Choi.
  • Paper titled "Do Androids Laugh at Electric Sheep?"
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jack Hessel, Ana Marasović, Jena D. Hwang, Lillian Lee, Jeff Da, Rowan Zellers, Robert Mankoff, Yejin Choi

Abstract: We challenge AI models to "demonstrate understanding" of the sophisticated multimodal humor of The New Yorker Caption Contest. Concretely, we develop three carefully circumscribed tasks for which it suffices (but is not necessary) to grasp potentially complex and unexpected relationships between image and caption, and similarly complex and unexpected allusions to the wide varieties of human experience; these are the hallmarks of a New Yorker-caliber cartoon. We investigate vision-and-language models that take as input the cartoon pixels and caption directly, as well as language-only models for which we circumvent image-processing by providing textual descriptions of the image. Even with the rich multifaceted annotations we provide for the cartoon images, we identify performance gaps between high-quality machine learning models (e.g., a fine-tuned, 175B parameter language model) and humans. We publicly release our corpora including annotations describing the image's locations/entities, what's unusual about the scene, and an explanation of the joke.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 Sep. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2209.06293v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The New Yorker Caption Contest is known for its sophisticated and nuanced humor, which often involves unexpected relationships between images and captions as well as allusions to a wide range of human experiences. In an effort to challenge AI models to "demonstrate understanding" of this type of humor, a team of researchers has developed three carefully circumscribed tasks that require grasping these complex relationships and allusions. The team investigates both vision-and-language models that take in cartoon pixels and captions directly as well as language-only models that use textual descriptions of the image. To aid future research in this area, the team publicly releases their corpora along with rich annotations for the cartoon images including descriptions of locations/entities, unusual aspects of the scene and explanations of the jokes. Despite providing such resources however there are still performance gaps between high-quality machine learning models (such as a fine-tuned 175B parameter language model) and humans. The study's authors include Jack Hessel, Ana Marasović, Jena D. Hwang, Lillian Lee, Jeff Da, Rowan Zellers, Robert Mankoff and Yejin Choi. Their paper is titled "Do Androids Laugh at Electric Sheep? ".
Created on 17 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.