What happens to psychological safety when going remote?

AI-generated keywords: Psychological Safety Remote Work Pull Requests Monday Commitments FridayWins

AI-generated Key Points

  • Psychological safety is crucial for learning and success in software teams
  • Face-to-face interaction has been a key factor in facilitating psychological safety
  • Remote work due to the pandemic has created challenges to psychological safety for Norwegian software developers
  • The study explores how remote work affects psychological safety and recommends simple behaviors and attitudes that can help maintain it
  • Hybrid work modes where team members alternate between working from home and the office are given special attention
  • Spontaneous interaction in the office facilitates psychological safety while remote work increases thresholds for both spontaneous interaction and psychological safety
  • Synchronizing office presence can increase chances for spontaneous interaction while still benefiting from focused work at home
  • Using pull requests (PRs) as a standard mechanism for reviewing code changes can facilitate knowledge sharing, early feedback, increased collaboration, and reduce risks of flawed code going into production.
  • Monday commitments and FridayWins are weekly team meetings that can help increase psychological safety by discussing progress toward team goals, prioritizing tasks for inclusion on boards, celebrating achievements during FridayWins meetings.
  • Postmortems are team meetings that allow teams to reflect on their successes and failures in projects or sprints.
  • Demos with customers also allow designers to get feedback on their designs before finalizing them.
  • Implementing simple behaviors such as PRs, Monday commitments and FridayWins meetings, postmortems, demos with customers, and synchronizing office presence when possible can help maintain psychological safety even when working remotely or in hybrid modes.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Anastasiia Tkalich, Darja Smite, Nina Haugland Andersen, Nils Brede Moe

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Psychological safety is a precondition for learning and success in software teams. Companies such as SavingsBank, which is discussed in this article, have developed good practices to facilitate psychological safety, most of which depend on face-to-face interaction. However, what happens to psychological safety when working remotely? In this article, we explore how Norwegian software developers experienced pandemic and post-pandemic remote work and describe simple behaviors and attitudes related to psychological safety. We pay special attention to the hybrid work mode, in which team members alternate days in the office with days working from home. Our key takeaway is that spontaneous interaction in the office facilitates psychological safety, while remote work increases the thresholds for both spontaneous interaction and psychological safety. We recommend that software teams synchronize their office presence to increase chances for spontaneous interaction in the office while benefitting from focused work while at home.

Submitted to arXiv on 26 Aug. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2208.12454v1

Psychological safety is crucial for learning and success in software teams, and face-to-face interaction has been a key factor in facilitating it. However, with the pandemic forcing remote work, Norwegian software developers have experienced challenges to psychological safety. In this study, the authors explore how remote work affects psychological safety and describe simple behaviors and attitudes that can help maintain it. The authors pay special attention to hybrid work modes where team members alternate between working from home and the office. The study found that spontaneous interaction in the office facilitates psychological safety while remote work increases thresholds for both spontaneous interaction and psychological safety. To address this issue, the authors recommend synchronizing office presence to increase chances for spontaneous interaction while still benefiting from focused work at home. Additionally, they suggest using pull requests (PRs) as a standard mechanism for reviewing code changes to facilitate knowledge sharing, early feedback, increased collaboration, and reduce risks of flawed code going into production. PRs also provide a good safety net for sharing responsibility if something goes wrong. Monday commitments and FridayWins are weekly team meetings that can help increase psychological safety by discussing progress toward team goals, prioritizing tasks for inclusion on boards, celebrating achievements during FridayWins meetings. Postmortems are team meetings that allow teams to reflect on their successes and failures in projects or sprints. Demos with customers also allow designers to get feedback on their designs before finalizing them. In conclusion, maintaining psychological safety is essential for successful remote work in software teams. By implementing simple behaviors such as PRs, Monday commitments and FridayWins meetings, postmortems, demos with customers, and synchronizing office presence when possible can help maintain psychological safety even when working remotely or in hybrid modes.
Created on 05 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.