Debiased Large Language Models Still Associate Muslims with Uniquely Violent Acts
AI-generated Key Points
- GPT-3 language model shows bias towards generating violent text completions when prompted about Muslims compared to Christians and Hindus
- Recent pre-registered replication attempts show weak bias in the more recent Instruct Series version of GPT-3, which has been fine-tuned to eliminate biased and toxic outputs
- Using common names associated with religions in prompts yielded a highly significant increase in violent completions, indicating a stronger second-order bias against Muslims
- Names of Muslim celebrities from non-violent domains resulted in relatively fewer violent completions, suggesting that access to individualized information can steer the model away from using stereotypes
- Content analysis reveals religion-specific violent themes containing highly offensive ideas regardless of prompt format
- Further debiasing of large language models is needed to address higher-order schemas and associations
- Even after debiasing efforts, such models still associate Muslims with uniquely violent acts
- Continued research into mitigating biases within AI systems and promoting ethical AI practices is important for ensuring fairness and accuracy in machine learning applications.
Authors: Babak Hemmatian, Lav R. Varshney
Abstract: Recent work demonstrates a bias in the GPT-3 model towards generating violent text completions when prompted about Muslims, compared with Christians and Hindus. Two pre-registered replication attempts, one exact and one approximate, found only the weakest bias in the more recent Instruct Series version of GPT-3, fine-tuned to eliminate biased and toxic outputs. Few violent completions were observed. Additional pre-registered experiments, however, showed that using common names associated with the religions in prompts yields a highly significant increase in violent completions, also revealing a stronger second-order bias against Muslims. Names of Muslim celebrities from non-violent domains resulted in relatively fewer violent completions, suggesting that access to individualized information can steer the model away from using stereotypes. Nonetheless, content analysis revealed religion-specific violent themes containing highly offensive ideas regardless of prompt format. Our results show the need for additional debiasing of large language models to address higher-order schemas and associations.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.