Debiased Large Language Models Still Associate Muslims with Uniquely Violent Acts

AI-generated keywords: GPT-3 Bias Violent Debias Religion

AI-generated Key Points

  • GPT-3 language model shows bias towards generating violent text completions when prompted about Muslims compared to Christians and Hindus
  • Recent pre-registered replication attempts show weak bias in the more recent Instruct Series version of GPT-3, which has been fine-tuned to eliminate biased and toxic outputs
  • Using common names associated with religions in prompts yielded a highly significant increase in violent completions, indicating a stronger second-order bias against Muslims
  • Names of Muslim celebrities from non-violent domains resulted in relatively fewer violent completions, suggesting that access to individualized information can steer the model away from using stereotypes
  • Content analysis reveals religion-specific violent themes containing highly offensive ideas regardless of prompt format
  • Further debiasing of large language models is needed to address higher-order schemas and associations
  • Even after debiasing efforts, such models still associate Muslims with uniquely violent acts
  • Continued research into mitigating biases within AI systems and promoting ethical AI practices is important for ensuring fairness and accuracy in machine learning applications.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Babak Hemmatian, Lav R. Varshney

6 pages, 1 figure, 3 tables
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Recent work demonstrates a bias in the GPT-3 model towards generating violent text completions when prompted about Muslims, compared with Christians and Hindus. Two pre-registered replication attempts, one exact and one approximate, found only the weakest bias in the more recent Instruct Series version of GPT-3, fine-tuned to eliminate biased and toxic outputs. Few violent completions were observed. Additional pre-registered experiments, however, showed that using common names associated with the religions in prompts yields a highly significant increase in violent completions, also revealing a stronger second-order bias against Muslims. Names of Muslim celebrities from non-violent domains resulted in relatively fewer violent completions, suggesting that access to individualized information can steer the model away from using stereotypes. Nonetheless, content analysis revealed religion-specific violent themes containing highly offensive ideas regardless of prompt format. Our results show the need for additional debiasing of large language models to address higher-order schemas and associations.

Submitted to arXiv on 08 Aug. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2208.04417v2

The GPT-3 language model has been found to exhibit a bias towards generating violent text completions when prompted about Muslims compared to Christians and Hindus. Recent pre-registered replication attempts have shown only weak bias in the more recent Instruct Series version of GPT-3, which has been fine-tuned to eliminate biased and toxic outputs. Additional experiments revealed that using common names associated with religions in prompts yielded a highly significant increase in violent completions, indicating a stronger second-order bias against Muslims. Interestingly, names of Muslim celebrities from non-violent domains resulted in relatively fewer violent completions, suggesting that access to individualized information can steer the model away from using stereotypes. Despite these findings, content analysis revealed religion-specific violent themes containing highly offensive ideas regardless of prompt format. These results highlight the need for further debiasing of large language models to address higher-order schemas and associations. It is concerning that even after debiasing efforts, such models still associate Muslims with uniquely violent acts. This study underscores the importance of continued research into mitigating biases within AI systems and promoting ethical AI practices to ensure fairness and accuracy in machine learning applications.
Created on 29 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.