The Effects of Data Quality on ML-Model Performance
AI-generated Key Points
- The paper presents a comprehensive experimental study on the correlation between six data quality dimensions and the performance of fifteen machine learning algorithms.
- The need for high-quality training and test data is crucial for reliable AI applications.
- This paper is the first systematic study of the effects of data quality dimensions not only for classification but also for clustering and regression tasks.
- The authors perform a targeted analysis for cases where serving data, training data or both are of low quality.
- The results show that there is a strong correlation between all six traditional dimensions of data quality and ML-models performance across all three types of tasks (classification, regression, and clustering).
- All polluters used in their experiments are available online alongside all datasets used in their study which can be easily extended with further quality dimensions or ML models.
Authors: Lukas Budach, Moritz Feuerpfeil, Nina Ihde, Andrea Nathansen, Nele Noack, Hendrik Patzlaff, Hazar Harmouch, Felix Naumann
Abstract: Modern artificial intelligence (AI) applications require large quantities of training and test data. This need creates critical challenges not only concerning the availability of such data, but also regarding its quality. For example, incomplete, erroneous or inappropriate training data can lead to unreliable models that produce ultimately poor decisions. Trustworthy AI applications require high-quality training and test data along many dimensions, such as accuracy, completeness, consistency, and uniformity. We explore empirically the correlation between six of the traditional data quality dimensions and the performance of fifteen widely used ML algorithms covering the tasks of classification, regression, and clustering, with the goal of explaining ML results in terms of data quality. Our experiments distinguish three scenarios based on the AI pipeline steps that were fed with polluted data: polluted training data, test data, or both. We conclude the paper with an extensive discussion of our observations and recommendations, alongside open questions and future directions to be explored.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.