Parker Bound and Monopole Pair Production from Primordial Magnetic Fields

AI-generated keywords: Primordial Magnetic Fields Monopole Pair Production Parker Bound Cosmic Abundance Early Universe

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors Takeshi Kobayashi and Daniele Perri establish new constraints on the cosmic abundance of magnetic monopoles
  • Bounds are based on survival of primordial magnetic fields during reheating and radiation-dominated epochs
  • Refined bounds can be more stringent than traditional Parker bound and limits from direct searches for magnetic monopoles
  • Analysis extends to monopoles generated by primordial magnetic fields via the Schwinger effect
  • Applying refined bounds provides additional criteria for sustained existence of primordial magnetic fields
  • Study enhances understanding of potential abundance of magnetic monopoles in cosmos and their interplay with fundamental particle physics processes during different epochs in early universe
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Takeshi Kobayashi, Daniele Perri

Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 063016
27 pages, 4 figures; typos corrected, references added

Abstract: We present new bounds on the cosmic abundance of magnetic monopoles based on the survival of primordial magnetic fields during the reheating and radiation-dominated epochs. The new bounds can be stronger than the conventional Parker bound from galactic magnetic fields, as well as bounds from direct searches. We also apply our bounds to monopoles produced by the primordial magnetic fields themselves through the Schwinger effect, and derive additional conditions for the survival of the primordial fields.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Jul. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2207.08246v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Parker Bound and Monopole Pair Production from Primordial Magnetic Fields," authors Takeshi Kobayashi and Daniele Perri present new constraints on the cosmic abundance of magnetic monopoles. These bounds are established based on the survival of primordial magnetic fields during both the reheating and radiation-dominated epochs in the early universe. The study reveals that these refined bounds can be more stringent than the traditional Parker bound derived from observations of galactic magnetic fields, as well as limits obtained from direct searches for magnetic monopoles. Furthermore, the researchers extend their analysis to investigate monopoles generated by the primordial magnetic fields themselves through a phenomenon known as the Schwinger effect. By applying their refined bounds to this scenario, they are able to derive additional criteria for the sustained existence of these primordial magnetic fields. This comprehensive study not only enhances our understanding of the potential abundance of magnetic monopoles in the cosmos but also sheds light on the intricate interplay between primordial magnetic fields and fundamental particle physics processes during different epochs in the early universe. The findings presented in this research contribute valuable insights to ongoing investigations into cosmological magnetogenesis and high-energy physics phenomena.
Created on 06 Jun. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.