Fibrational linguistics: Language acquisition
AI-generated Key Points
- The authors explore how FibLang can be used to describe vocabulary acquisition
- Vocabulary acquisition involves acquiring meaning through witness or rephrasing with known words
- A category-theoretic model for vocabulary acquisition by paraphrasis is provided using free promonads
- Parallels are drawn between their work and Wittgenstein's dynamical approach to language games
- DisCoCirc framework has been adopted due to implementation aspects regarding quantum computers, providing stronger foundations for FibLang's philosophical stance
- The paper is structured into sections 2-5, which provide a recap of basic definitions, describe vocabulary acquisition by example, define explanations as a tool, and use them to define vocabulary acquisition by paraphrasis.
- Construction 5.3 shows how the formalization of vocabulary acquisition can be used to enrich grammar by acknowledging semantic interrelations.
- The paper contributes to our understanding of first-language acquisition processes and offers insights into how category theory can be applied in linguistics research.
Authors: Fabrizio Genovese, Fosco Loregian, Caterina Puca
Abstract: In this work we show how FibLang, a category-theoretic framework concerned with the interplay between language and meaning, can be used to describe vocabulary acquisition, that is the process with which a speaker $p$ acquires new vocabulary (through experience or interaction). We model two different kinds of vocabulary acquisition, which we call `by example' and `by paraphrasis'. The former captures the idea of acquiring the meaning of a word by being shown a witness representing that word, as in `understanding what a cat is, by looking at a cat'. The latter captures the idea of acquiring meaning by listening to some other speaker rephrasing the word with others already known to the learner. We provide a category-theoretic model for vocabulary acquisition by paraphrasis based on the construction of free promonads. We draw parallels between our work and Wittgenstein's dynamical approach to language, commonly known as 'language games'.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.