GitHub Copilot AI pair programmer: Asset or Liability?
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Open AI and Microsoft proposed a Deep Learning (DL) based solution called Copilot for automatic program synthesis in software engineering.
- More empirical evaluations are necessary to understand how developers can effectively benefit from Copilot.
- The study assessed the capabilities of Copilot in two different programming tasks: generating correct and efficient solutions for fundamental algorithmic problems, and comparing its proposed solutions with those generated by human programmers on a set of programming tasks.
- Copilot is capable of providing solutions for almost all fundamental algorithmic problems, but some solutions were buggy and non-reproducible. Additionally, it had difficulties combining multiple methods to generate a solution.
- While the correct ratio of human solutions was greater than Copilot's correct ratio, buggy solutions generated by Copilot required less effort to repair.
- Further research is necessary to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of Copilot as an industrial product.
Authors: Arghavan Moradi Dakhel (Jack), Vahid Majdinasab (Jack), Amin Nikanjam (Jack), Foutse Khomh (Jack), Michel C. Desmarais (Jack), Zhen Ming (Jack), Jiang
Abstract: Automatic program synthesis is a long-lasting dream in software engineering. Recently, a promising Deep Learning (DL) based solution, called Copilot, has been proposed by Open AI and Microsoft as an industrial product. Although some studies evaluate the correctness of Copilot solutions and report its issues, more empirical evaluations are necessary to understand how developers can benefit from it effectively. In this paper, we study the capabilities of Copilot in two different programming tasks: (1) generating (and reproducing) correct and efficient solutions for fundamental algorithmic problems, and (2) comparing Copilot's proposed solutions with those of human programmers on a set of programming tasks. For the former, we assess the performance and functionality of Copilot in solving selected fundamental problems in computer science, like sorting and implementing basic data structures. In the latter, a dataset of programming problems with human-provided solutions is used. The results show that Copilot is capable of providing solutions for almost all fundamental algorithmic problems, however, some solutions are buggy and non-reproducible. Moreover, Copilot has some difficulties in combining multiple methods to generate a solution. Comparing Copilot to humans, our results show that the correct ratio of human solutions is greater than Copilot's correct ratio, while the buggy solutions generated by Copilot require less effort to be repaired. While Copilot shows limitations as an assistant for developers especially in advanced programming tasks, as highlighted in this study and previous ones, it can generate preliminary solutions for basic programming tasks.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.