Insurance pricing with hierarchically structured data: An illustration with a workers' compensation insurance portfolio

AI-generated keywords: Predictive Modeling Hierarchically Structured Risk Factors Workers' Compensation Insurance Tweedie Distribution Risk Differentiation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper explores the use of predictive modeling techniques to assess loss costs on a contract as a function of observable risk characteristics.
  • State-of-the-art statistical and machine learning methods are not well equipped to handle hierarchically structured risk factors with a large number of levels.
  • The paper demonstrates the construction of a data-driven insurance pricing model when hierarchically structured risk factors, both contract-specific and externally collected ones, are available.
  • The study focuses on the pricing of a workers' compensation insurance product using three different models: hierarchical credibility model, Ohlsson's combination of a generalized linear and hierarchical credibility model, and mixed models.
  • The authors compare the predictive performance of these models and evaluate the effect of distributional assumptions on the target variable by comparing linear mixed models with Tweedie generalized linear mixed models.
  • For their case-study, the Tweedie distribution is well suited to model and predict the loss cost on a contract.
  • Incorporating contract-specific risk factors in the predictive model improves performance and allows for improved risk differentiation in their workers' compensation insurance portfolio.
  • This paper provides valuable insights into how actuaries can effectively use predictive modeling techniques to assess loss costs on contracts while accounting for hierarchically structured risk factors.
  • The findings have important implications for insurers looking to improve their pricing strategies and better manage risks associated with complex insurance products like workers' compensation.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Bavo D. C. Campo, Katrien Antonio

36 pages (including Appendix), 18 figures and 3 tables

Abstract: Actuaries use predictive modeling techniques to assess the loss cost on a contract as a function of observable risk characteristics. State-of-the-art statistical and machine learning methods are not well equipped to handle hierarchically structured risk factors with a large number of levels. In this paper, we demonstrate the construction of a data-driven insurance pricing model when hierarchically structured risk factors, contract-specific as well as externally collected risk factors are available. We examine the pricing of a workers' compensation insurance product with a hierarchical credibility model (Jewell, 1975), Ohlsson's combination of a generalized linear and a hierarchical credibility model (Ohlsson, 2008) and mixed models. We compare the predictive performance of these models and evaluate the effect of the distributional assumption on the target variable by comparing linear mixed models with Tweedie generalized linear mixed models. For our case-study the Tweedie distribution is well suited to model and predict the loss cost on a contract. Moreover, incorporating contract-specific risk factors in the predictive model improves the performance and allows for a improved risk differentiation in our workers' compensation insurance portfolio.

Submitted to arXiv on 30 Jun. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2206.15244v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper "Insurance pricing with hierarchically structured data: An illustration with a workers' compensation insurance portfolio" explores the use of predictive modeling techniques to assess the loss cost on a contract as a function of observable risk characteristics. The authors note that state-of-the-art statistical and machine learning methods are not well equipped to handle hierarchically structured risk factors with a large number of levels. To address this issue, the paper demonstrates the construction of a data-driven insurance pricing model when hierarchically structured risk factors, both contract-specific and externally collected ones, are available. The study focuses on the pricing of a workers' compensation insurance product using three different models: hierarchical credibility model (Jewell, 1975), Ohlsson's combination of a generalized linear and hierarchical credibility model (Ohlsson, 2008), and mixed models. The authors compare the predictive performance of these models and evaluate the effect of distributional assumptions on the target variable by comparing linear mixed models with Tweedie generalized linear mixed models. The results show that for their case-study, the Tweedie distribution is well suited to model and predict the loss cost on a contract. Additionally, incorporating contract-specific risk factors in the predictive model improves performance and allows for improved risk differentiation in their workers' compensation insurance portfolio. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into how actuaries can effectively use predictive modeling techniques to assess loss costs on contracts while accounting for hierarchically structured risk factors. The findings have important implications for insurers looking to improve their pricing strategies and better manage risks associated with complex insurance products like workers' compensation.
Created on 18 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.