Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2206.13317v1

The use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for automatic segmentation of organs-at-risk (OARs) in CT scans has become increasingly popular in radiotherapy workflows. However, these segmentations still require manual editing and approval by clinicians prior to clinical use, which can be time-consuming and prone to errors. To address this issue, a team of researchers from the University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust developed a tool that automatically identifies errors in 3D OAR segmentations without the need for ground truth data. The proposed tool uses a novel architecture that combines a CNN and graph neural network (GNN) to leverage both the appearance and shape of the segmentation. The model was trained using self-supervised learning on a synthetically-generated dataset of segmentations of the parotid gland with realistic contouring errors. Ablation tests were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different portions of the architecture as well as transfer learning from an unsupervised pretext task. The results showed that their best performing model predicted errors on the parotid gland with a precision of 85.0% & 89.7% for internal and external errors respectively, and recall of 66.5% & 68.6%. This offline quality assurance tool could potentially decrease the time clinicians spend correcting contours by detecting regions that require their attention. This research paper has been accepted for presentation at the 25th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2022). It is important to note that this preprint has not undergone peer review or any post-submission improvements or corrections yet. Overall, this study presents a promising approach towards improving radiotherapy workflows by automating error detection in OAR segmentations without relying on ground truth data. The code used in this study is publicly available on GitHub for further development and implementation in clinical settings. This could help reduce time spent manually editing OAR segmentations while increasing accuracy and reliability in radiotherapy treatments.

• - Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are used for automatic segmentation of organs-at-risk (OARs) in CT scans
• - Manual editing and approval by clinicians is still required prior to clinical use, which can be time-consuming and prone to errors
• - A tool was developed that automatically identifies errors in 3D OAR segmentations without the need for ground truth data
• - The proposed tool uses a novel architecture that combines a CNN and graph neural network (GNN) to leverage both the appearance and shape of the segmentation
• - The model was trained using self-supervised learning on a synthetically-generated dataset of segmentations of the parotid gland with realistic contouring errors
• - Results showed that their best performing model predicted errors on the parotid gland with high precision and recall rates
• - This offline quality assurance tool could potentially decrease the time clinicians spend correcting contours by detecting regions that require their attention
• - The code used in this study is publicly available on GitHub for further development and implementation in clinical settings.

Summary: Scientists made a computer program that helps doctors see organs in CT scans. Sometimes, the program makes mistakes, so doctors have to check it. The scientists made a new tool that finds mistakes without needing extra information. This tool uses two types of computer networks to look at how the organ looks and its shape. They trained the tool using fake data of one organ with mistakes. The tool found mistakes on this organ very well. It could help doctors save time by finding mistakes for them. Definitions- Convolutional neural networks (CNNs): A type of computer network used for image recognition. - Automatic segmentation: Separating an image into different parts. - Clinicians: Doctors or other medical professionals who work with patients. - Ground truth data: Real-world information used to train a machine learning model. - Graph neural network (GNN): A type of computer network used for analyzing relationships between objects. - Self-supervised learning: Learning from data without needing human input or labeling. - Parotid gland: A salivary gland located near the ear. - Precision and recall rates: Measures of how well a machine learning model can correctly identify things in an image. - Quality assurance tool: Something that checks if something is working correctly or not.

Automating Error Detection in Organ-At-Risk Segmentations with Convolutional Neural Networks and Graph Neural Networks

Organ-at-risk (OAR) segmentation is an important step in radiotherapy workflows, as it helps clinicians identify the areas of a patient’s body that need to be treated. However, due to the complexity of OAR segmentation, manual editing and approval by clinicians is often required prior to clinical use. This process can be time consuming and prone to errors. To address this issue, a team of researchers from the University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust developed a tool that automatically identifies errors in 3D OAR segmentations without the need for ground truth data.

Background

The use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for automatic segmentation of organs-at-risk (OARs) has become increasingly popular in radiotherapy workflows. However, these segmentations still require manual editing and approval by clinicians prior to clinical use, which can be time consuming and prone to errors. To address this issue, a team of researchers from the University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust developed a tool that automatically identifies errors in 3D OAR segmentations without the need for ground truth data.

Methodology

The proposed tool uses a novel architecture that combines a CNN and graph neural network (GNN) to leverage both the appearance and shape of the segmentation. The model was trained using self-supervised learning on a synthetically generated dataset of segmentations with realistic contouring errors. Ablation tests were conducted to evaluate different portions of the architecture as well as transfer learning from an unsupervised pretext task.

Results

The results showed that their best performing model predicted errors on parotid gland with precision 85% & 89% for internal & external respectively & recall 66% & 68%. This offline quality assurance tool could potentially decrease time spent correcting contours by detecting regions requiring attention while increasing accuracy & reliability in radiotherapy treatments.

Conclusion

This research paper presents promising approach towards improving radiotherapy workflows by automating error detection in OAR segmentations without relying on ground truth data. The code used is publicly available on GitHub for further development & implementation into clinical settings which could help reduce time spent manually editing OAR segmentations while increasing accuracy & reliability in radiotherapy treatments .