Automatic identification of segmentation errors for radiotherapy using geometric learning
AI-generated Key Points
- Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are used for automatic segmentation of organs-at-risk (OARs) in CT scans
- Manual editing and approval by clinicians is still required prior to clinical use, which can be time-consuming and prone to errors
- A tool was developed that automatically identifies errors in 3D OAR segmentations without the need for ground truth data
- The proposed tool uses a novel architecture that combines a CNN and graph neural network (GNN) to leverage both the appearance and shape of the segmentation
- The model was trained using self-supervised learning on a synthetically-generated dataset of segmentations of the parotid gland with realistic contouring errors
- Results showed that their best performing model predicted errors on the parotid gland with high precision and recall rates
- This offline quality assurance tool could potentially decrease the time clinicians spend correcting contours by detecting regions that require their attention
- The code used in this study is publicly available on GitHub for further development and implementation in clinical settings.
Authors: Edward G. A. Henderson, Andrew F. Green, Marcel van Herk, Eliana M. Vasquez Osorio
Abstract: Automatic segmentation of organs-at-risk (OARs) in CT scans using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) is being introduced into the radiotherapy workflow. However, these segmentations still require manual editing and approval by clinicians prior to clinical use, which can be time consuming. The aim of this work was to develop a tool to automatically identify errors in 3D OAR segmentations without a ground truth. Our tool uses a novel architecture combining a CNN and graph neural network (GNN) to leverage the segmentation's appearance and shape. The proposed model is trained using self-supervised learning using a synthetically-generated dataset of segmentations of the parotid and with realistic contouring errors. The effectiveness of our model is assessed with ablation tests, evaluating the efficacy of different portions of the architecture as well as the use of transfer learning from an unsupervised pretext task. Our best performing model predicted errors on the parotid gland with a precision of 85.0% & 89.7% for internal and external errors respectively, and recall of 66.5% & 68.6%. This offline QA tool could be used in the clinical pathway, potentially decreasing the time clinicians spend correcting contours by detecting regions which require their attention. All our code is publicly available at https://github.com/rrr-uom-projects/contour_auto_QATool.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.