Image-based Stability Quantification

AI-generated keywords: Human Stability Image-Based Method Center of Mass Base of Support Center of Pressure

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Human stability evaluation is often expensive, time-consuming and limited to laboratory settings
  • The authors propose a novel image-based method for estimating three key components necessary for stability computation: Center of Mass (CoM), Base of Support (BoS), and Center of Pressure (CoP)
  • The image-based CoM estimation method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art inertial sensor-based CoM estimation techniques
  • When combined with insole foot pressure sensor data, the stability computed by the image-based method produces strong and statistically significant correlations with ground truth stability measures
  • The fully image-based estimation of stability produces consistent positive correlations on both stability metrics
  • This study provides evidence for the feasibility of image-based stability evaluation in natural environments without requiring expensive or time consuming equipment or limiting participants to laboratory settings
  • The proposed method has potential applications in various fields such as sports medicine, physical therapy and robotics where assessing human balance is crucial for performance optimization and injury prevention.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jesse Scott, John Challis, Robert T. Collins, Yanxi Liu

Abstract: Quantitative evaluation of human stability using foot pressure/force measurement hardware and motion capture (mocap) technology is expensive, time consuming, and restricted to the laboratory. We propose a novel image-based method to estimate three key components for stability computation: Center of Mass (CoM), Base of Support (BoS), and Center of Pressure (CoP). Furthermore, we quantitatively validate our image-based methods for computing two classic stability measures, CoMtoCoP and CoMtoBoS distances, against values generated directly from laboratory-based sensor output (ground truth) using a publicly available, multi-modality (mocap, foot pressure, two-view videos), ten-subject human motion dataset. Using Leave One Subject Out (LOSO) cross-validation, experimental results show: 1) our image-based CoM estimation method (CoMNet) consistently outperforms state-of-the-art inertial sensor-based CoM estimation techniques; 2) stability computed by our image-based method combined with insole foot pressure sensor data produces consistent, strong, and statistically significant correlation with ground truth stability measures (CoMtoCoP r = 0.79 p < 0.001, CoMtoBoS r = 0.75 p < 0.001); 3) our fully image-based estimation of stability produces consistent, positive, and statistically significant correlation on the two stability metrics (CoMtoCoP r = 0.31 p < 0.001, CoMtoBoS r = 0.22 p < 0.043). Our study provides promising quantitative evidence for the feasibility of image-based stability evaluation in natural environments.

Submitted to arXiv on 23 Jun. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2206.11443v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The evaluation of human stability is often expensive, time-consuming and limited to laboratory settings. In this study, the authors propose a novel image-based method for estimating three key components necessary for stability computation: Center of Mass (CoM), Base of Support (BoS), and Center of Pressure (CoP). The authors validate their image-based methods by computing two classic stability measures - CoMtoCoP and CoMtoBoS distances - against values generated directly from laboratory-based sensor output (ground truth) using a publicly available ten-subject human motion dataset that includes mocap, foot pressure, and two-view videos. Using Leave One Subject Out (LOSO) cross-validation, the experimental results demonstrate that the image-based CoM estimation method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art inertial sensor-based CoM estimation techniques. Additionally, when combined with insole foot pressure sensor data, the stability computed by the image-based method produces strong and statistically significant correlations with ground truth stability measures (CoMtoCoP r = 0.79 p < 0.001; CoMtoBoS r = 0.75 p < 0.001). Furthermore, the fully image-based estimation of stability produces consistent positive correlations on both stability metrics (CoMtoCoP r = 0.31 p < 0.001; CoMtoBoS r = 0.22 p < 0.043). Overall, this study provides evidence for the feasibility of image-based stability evaluation in natural environments without requiring expensive or time consuming equipment or limiting participants to laboratory settings. The proposed method has potential applications in various fields such as sports medicine, physical therapy and robotics where assessing human balance is crucial for performance optimization and injury prevention.
Created on 18 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.