How to Assess Trustworthy AI in Practice
AI-generated Key Points
- The report discusses the Z-Inspection® initiative, which evaluates the trustworthiness of AI-based technologies at different stages of their life-cycle.
- The focus is on identifying and discussing ethical issues and tensions using EU HLEG guidelines for trustworthy AI.
- The initiative involves a team of experts with diverse backgrounds who create socio-technical scenarios to identify potential issues related to trustworthiness.
- Ethical tensions that arise during the assessment process are classified into categories using a consensus process based on mapping.
- Recommendations are provided for monitoring AI over time and conducting fundamental rights assessments as part of an overall trustworthy AI assessment throughout the life-cycle of an AI system.
- Shortcomings in this approach may include challenges with data availability or limitations in expertise, but it offers practical suggestions for ensuring rigorous trustworthy AI assessments.
Authors: Roberto V. Zicari, Julia Amann, Frédérick Bruneault, Megan Coffee, Boris Düdder, Eleanore Hickman, Alessio Gallucci, Thomas Krendl Gilbert, Thilo Hagendorff, Irmhild van Halem, Elisabeth Hildt, Georgios Kararigas, Pedro Kringen, Vince I. Madai, Emilie Wiinblad Mathez, Jesmin Jahan Tithi, Dennis Vetter, Magnus Westerlund, Renee Wurth
Abstract: This report is a methodological reflection on Z-Inspection. Z-Inspection is a holistic process used to evaluate the trustworthiness of AI-based technologies at different stages of the AI lifecycle. It focuses, in particular, on the identification and discussion of ethical issues and tensions through the elaboration of socio-technical scenarios. It uses the general European Union's High-Level Expert Group's (EU HLEG) guidelines for trustworthy AI. This report illustrates for both AI researchers and AI practitioners how the EU HLEG guidelines for trustworthy AI can be applied in practice. We share the lessons learned from conducting a series of independent assessments to evaluate the trustworthiness of AI systems in healthcare. We also share key recommendations and practical suggestions on how to ensure a rigorous trustworthy AI assessment throughout the life-cycle of an AI system.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.