How to Assess Trustworthy AI in Practice

AI-generated keywords: Trustworthiness AI EU HLEG Socio-Technical Scenarios Mapping

AI-generated Key Points

  • The report discusses the Z-Inspection® initiative, which evaluates the trustworthiness of AI-based technologies at different stages of their life-cycle.
  • The focus is on identifying and discussing ethical issues and tensions using EU HLEG guidelines for trustworthy AI.
  • The initiative involves a team of experts with diverse backgrounds who create socio-technical scenarios to identify potential issues related to trustworthiness.
  • Ethical tensions that arise during the assessment process are classified into categories using a consensus process based on mapping.
  • Recommendations are provided for monitoring AI over time and conducting fundamental rights assessments as part of an overall trustworthy AI assessment throughout the life-cycle of an AI system.
  • Shortcomings in this approach may include challenges with data availability or limitations in expertise, but it offers practical suggestions for ensuring rigorous trustworthy AI assessments.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Roberto V. Zicari, Julia Amann, Frédérick Bruneault, Megan Coffee, Boris Düdder, Eleanore Hickman, Alessio Gallucci, Thomas Krendl Gilbert, Thilo Hagendorff, Irmhild van Halem, Elisabeth Hildt, Georgios Kararigas, Pedro Kringen, Vince I. Madai, Emilie Wiinblad Mathez, Jesmin Jahan Tithi, Dennis Vetter, Magnus Westerlund, Renee Wurth

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: This report is a methodological reflection on Z-Inspection. Z-Inspection is a holistic process used to evaluate the trustworthiness of AI-based technologies at different stages of the AI lifecycle. It focuses, in particular, on the identification and discussion of ethical issues and tensions through the elaboration of socio-technical scenarios. It uses the general European Union's High-Level Expert Group's (EU HLEG) guidelines for trustworthy AI. This report illustrates for both AI researchers and AI practitioners how the EU HLEG guidelines for trustworthy AI can be applied in practice. We share the lessons learned from conducting a series of independent assessments to evaluate the trustworthiness of AI systems in healthcare. We also share key recommendations and practical suggestions on how to ensure a rigorous trustworthy AI assessment throughout the life-cycle of an AI system.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Jun. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2206.09887v1

This report provides a comprehensive methodological reflection on the Z-Inspection® initiative, which is a holistic process used to evaluate the trustworthiness of AI-based technologies at different stages of the AI lifecycle. The focus is on identifying and discussing ethical issues and tensions through the elaboration of socio-technical scenarios, using the general European Union's High-Level Expert Group's (EU HLEG) guidelines for trustworthy AI. The report illustrates how these guidelines can be applied in practice for both AI researchers and practitioners. The Z-Inspection® initiative involves a team of experts chosen based on their diverse backgrounds, skills, and experiences. They define the boundaries of the assessment and develop an evidence base by creating socio-technical scenarios that identify potential issues related to trustworthiness. The team manages different viewpoints and uses free text with an open vocabulary to describe these issues while building concepts in practice. The initiative also identifies value conflicts and trade-offs through ethical tensions that arise during the assessment process. A consensus process based on mapping is used to classify these tensions into categories, which are then consolidated using various mapping strategies. This consolidation can be challenging but can be aided by natural language processing techniques. Finally, the report provides recommendations for monitoring AI over time and conducting fundamental rights assessments as part of an overall trustworthy AI assessment throughout the life-cycle of an AI system. While there may be some shortcomings in this approach such as challenges with data availability or limitations in expertise, it offers practical suggestions for ensuring rigorous trustworthy AI assessments. Overall, this report serves as a valuable resource for those seeking to evaluate the trustworthiness of AI-based technologies using a holistic approach that considers ethical issues and tensions throughout their life-cycle.
Created on 30 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.