Tracing the Top-of-the-atmosphere and Vertical Cloud Structure of a fast-rotating late T-dwarf
AI-generated Key Points
- Study focuses on atmospheric cloud structures of late-T brown dwarfs
- Monitored 2MASSJ00501994-332240, a T7.0 rapidly rotating field brown dwarf with low-level photometric variability
- Used MOSFIRE installed at the Keck I telescope to measure near-infrared spectro-photometric variability
- Detected peak-to-peak amplitudes of fluctuations in different light curves:
- 1.48±0.75% in J-band photometric light curve
- 0.62±0.18% in J-band spectro-photometric light curve
- 1.26±0.93% in H-band light curve
- 5.33±2.02% in CH_4–H_2O band light curve
- Bayesian Information Criterion did not detect significant variability due to detection limitations from MOSFIRE sensitivity; therefore only tentative low-level variability could be claimed for 2M0050–3322 under best-case scenarios.
- Amplitudes of peak-to-peak fluctuations measured for 2MASSJ00501994–332240 agree with General Circulation Models' predictions for a T7.0 brown dwarf for an edge-on object's variability amplitude prediction.
- Radiative-transfer models predict that Na_2S and KCl clouds condense at pressures lower than that traced by CH_4–H_2O bands which might explain higher peak-to-peak fluctuations measured for this light curve.
- Authors provide visual recreation of maps provided by General Circulation Models and vertical structure provided by radiative transfer models comparing their results with other late T brown dwarfs and found several differences and commonalities between them such as only two other late T dwarfs have been monitored for spectro photometric variability: 2MASS J22282889 – 431026 (T6 .5) and Ross 458c (T7 .5).
Authors: Elena Manjavacas, Theodora Karalidi, Xianyu Tan, Johanna M. Vos, Ben W. P. Lew, Beth A. Biller, Natalia Oliveros-Gomez
Abstract: Only a handful of late-T brown dwarfs have been monitored for spectro-photometric variability, leaving incomplete the study of the atmospheric cloud structures of the coldest brown dwarfs, that share temperatures with some cold, directly-imaged exoplanets. 2MASSJ00501994-332240 is a T7.0 rapidly rotating, field brown dwarf that showed low-level photometric variability in data obtained with the Spitzer Space telescope. We monitored 2MASSJ00501994-332240 during ~2.6 hr with MOSFIRE, installed at the Keck I telescope, with the aim of constraining its near-infrared spectro-photometric variability. We measured fluctuations with a peak-to-peak amplitude of 1.48+\-0.75% in the J-band photometric light curve, an amplitude of 0.62+/-0.18% in the J-band spectro-photometric light curve, and an amplitude of 1.26+/-0.93% in the H-band light curve, and an amplitude of 5.33+/-2.02% in the CH_4-H_2O band light curve. Nevertheless, the Bayesian Information Criterion does not detect significant variability in any of the light curves. Thus, given the detection limitations due to the MOSFIRE sensitivity, we can only claim tentative low-level variability for 2M0050-3322 in the best-case scenario. The amplitudes of the peak-to-peak fluctuations measured for 2MASSJ00501994-332240 agree with the variability amplitude predictions of General Circulation Models for a T7.0 brown dwarf for an edge on object. Radiative-transfer models predict that the Na_2S and KCl clouds condense at pressures lower than that traced by the CH_4-H_2O band, which might explain the higher peak-to-peak fluctuations measured for this light curve. Finally, we provide a visual recreation of the map provided by General Circulation Models and the vertical structure of 2MASSJ00501994-332240 provided by radiative-transfer models.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.