Remote Collaboration Fuses Fewer Breakthrough Ideas
AI-generated Key Points
- The world is witnessing an unprecedented level of interconnectedness among scientists and inventors.
- Despite the growing number of researchers and the increasing ease of remote collaboration across cities, research suggests that new ideas are getting harder to find.
- Researchers analyzed 20 million research articles and 4 million patent applications from around the globe over the past half-century to shed light on this apparent puzzle.
- Remote collaboration has been on the rise across cities, underlining the growing interconnectedness of scientists and inventors globally.
- Researchers in these remote teams are consistently less likely to make breakthrough discoveries relative to their onsite counterparts.
- Collaboration centers on late-stage technical tasks like collecting and analyzing data but is less likely to occur during conceptual tasks such as conceiving new ideas or designing research.
- Remote teams are less likely to integrate knowledge from their members to produce new disruptive ideas despite striking improvements in digital technology in recent years.
- Physical proximity is important in fostering creativity through face-to-face interactions during conceptual tasks.
- These findings have significant implications for policymakers seeking to promote innovation by encouraging collaboration between researchers across different locations while recognizing the limitations of remote teamwork when it comes to generating breakthrough ideas.
Authors: Yiling Lin, Carl Benedikt Frey, Lingfei Wu
Abstract: Scientists and inventors around the world are more plentiful and interconnected today than ever before. But while there are more people making discoveries, and more ideas that can be reconfigured in novel ways, research suggests that new ideas are getting harder to find-contradicting recombinant growth theory. In this paper, we shed new light on this apparent puzzle. Analyzing 20 million research articles and 4 million patent applications across the globe over the past half-century, we begin by documenting the rise of remote collaboration across cities, underlining the growing interconnectedness of scientists and inventors globally. We further show that across all fields, periods, and team sizes, researchers in these remote teams are consistently less likely to make breakthrough discoveries relative to their onsite counterparts. Using novel datasets that allow us to explore the division of labor within teams and across space, we find that among distributed team members, collaboration centers on late-stage, technical tasks, like collecting and analyzing data. Yet they are less likely to join forces in conceptual tasks, such as conceiving new ideas and designing research. We conclude that despite striking improvements in digital technology in recent years, remote teams are less likely to integrate the knowledge of their members to produce new, disruptive ideas.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.