ILMART: Interpretable Ranking with Constrained LambdaMART

AI-generated keywords: Interpretable Learning to Rank (LtR)

AI-generated Key Points

  • Interpretable Learning to Rank (LtR) is a growing field in the realm of explainable AI
  • It aims to develop accurate and intelligible predictive models
  • Previous research has focused on creating post-hoc explanations for black-box models
  • This paper investigates how to train effective and intrinsically-interpretable ranking models
  • Developing such models is challenging as it requires finding a balance between ranking quality and model complexity
  • State-of-the-art rankers are made up of large ensembles of trees or several neural layers that exploit an unlimited number of feature interactions, making them difficult to interpret
  • ILMART is a novel interpretable LtR solution based on LambdaMART that trains effective and intelligible models by exploiting a limited and controlled number of pairwise feature interactions
  • Exhaustive experiments conducted on three publicly-available LtR datasets show that ILMART outperforms the current state-of-the-art solution for interpretable ranking with a gain of nDCG up to 8%
  • The authors also demonstrate that ILMART can effectively exploit feature interactions without hindering overall interpretability
  • As future work, the authors plan to investigate new techniques based on boosting methods for building accurate and interpretable ranking models while identifying main and interaction effects during learning.
  • This work lays the foundation for developing new accurate LtR models that are also interpretable.
  • Overall, this paper highlights the importance of developing interpretable machine learning models in high-stakes decision-making scenarios where transparency is crucial.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Claudio Lucchese, Franco Maria Nardini, Salvatore Orlando, Raffaele Perego, Alberto Veneri

5 pages, 3 figures, to be published in SIGIR 2022 proceedings
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Interpretable Learning to Rank (LtR) is an emerging field within the research area of explainable AI, aiming at developing intelligible and accurate predictive models. While most of the previous research efforts focus on creating post-hoc explanations, in this paper we investigate how to train effective and intrinsically-interpretable ranking models. Developing these models is particularly challenging and it also requires finding a trade-off between ranking quality and model complexity. State-of-the-art rankers, made of either large ensembles of trees or several neural layers, exploit in fact an unlimited number of feature interactions making them black boxes. Previous approaches on intrinsically-interpretable ranking models address this issue by avoiding interactions between features thus paying a significant performance drop with respect to full-complexity models. Conversely, ILMART, our novel and interpretable LtR solution based on LambdaMART, is able to train effective and intelligible models by exploiting a limited and controlled number of pairwise feature interactions. Exhaustive and reproducible experiments conducted on three publicly-available LtR datasets show that ILMART outperforms the current state-of-the-art solution for interpretable ranking of a large margin with a gain of nDCG of up to 8%.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Jun. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2206.00473v1

Interpretable Learning to Rank (LtR) is a growing field in the realm of explainable AI, which aims to develop accurate and intelligible predictive models. While previous research has focused on creating post-hoc explanations for black-box models, this paper investigates how to train effective and intrinsically-interpretable ranking models. However, developing such models is challenging as it requires finding a balance between ranking quality and model complexity. State-of-the-art rankers are made up of large ensembles of trees or several neural layers that exploit an unlimited number of feature interactions, making them difficult to interpret. Previous approaches have addressed this issue by avoiding feature interactions but at the cost of significant performance drops compared to full-complexity models. In contrast, ILMART is a novel interpretable LtR solution based on LambdaMART that trains effective and intelligible models by exploiting a limited and controlled number of pairwise feature interactions. Exhaustive experiments conducted on three publicly-available LtR datasets show that ILMART outperforms the current state-of-the-art solution for interpretable ranking with a gain of nDCG up to 8%. The authors also demonstrate that ILMART can effectively exploit feature interactions without hindering overall interpretability. As future work, the authors plan to investigate new techniques based on boosting methods for building accurate and interpretable ranking models while identifying main and interaction effects during learning. This work lays the foundation for developing new accurate LtR models that are also interpretable. Overall, this paper highlights the importance of developing interpretable machine learning models in high-stakes decision-making scenarios where transparency is crucial. It contributes significantly to the growing body of research in explainable AI by proposing an effective approach towards building intrinsically-interpretable ranking models with improved performance compared to existing solutions.
Created on 08 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.