New Photometric Calibration of the Wide Field Camera 3 Detectors

AI-generated keywords: Hubble Space Telescope

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The Hubble Space Telescope's Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) detectors have received a new photometric calibration based on observations collected between 2009 and 2020.
  • Four white dwarfs and a G-type star were used for the calibration.
  • Time-dependent inverse sensitivities were calculated for the two WFC3-UVIS chips, UVIS1 and UVIS2, for all 42 full-frame filters after accounting for temporal changes in the observed count rates with respect to a reference epoch in 2009.
  • New encircled energy values were derived for some filters, while improved sensitivity ratios were obtained by correcting for sensitivity changes over time.
  • The updated inverse sensitivity values were derived using the new models for the primary standards and the new Vega reference flux.
  • New flat fields were used in the case of the IR detector.
  • The new calibration provides a photometric internal precision better than 0.5% for wide-, medium-, and narrow-band WFC3-UVIS filters, 5% for quad filters, and 1% for WFC3-IR filters.
  • An updated set of photometric keywords are populated in the WFC3 image headers providing more accurate information about each image taken with this instrument as of October 15th, 2020.
  • Researchers from Space Telescope Science Institute contributed to refining this important calibration tool that will help astronomers make more precise measurements of celestial objects observed by Hubble's WFC3 detectors.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: A. Calamida (Space Telescope Science Institute), V. Bajaj (Space Telescope Science Institute), J. Mack (Space Telescope Science Institute), M. Marinelli (Space Telescope Science Institute), J. Medina (Space Telescope Science Institute), A. Pidgeon (Space Telescope Science Institute), V. Kozhurina-Platais (Space Telescope Science Institute), C. Shanahan (Space Telescope Science Institute), D. Som (Space Telescope Science Institute)

arXiv: 2205.13014v1 - DOI (astro-ph.IM)
38 pages, 23 figures, accepted for publication on the Astronomical Journal

Abstract: We present a new photometric calibration of the WFC3-UVIS and WFC3-IR detectors based on observations collected from 2009 to 2020 for four white dwarfs, namely GRW+70~5824, GD~153, GD~71, G191B2B, and a G-type star, P330E. These calibrations include recent updates to the Hubble Space Telescope primary standard white dwarf models and a new reference flux for Vega. Time-dependent inverse sensitivities for the two WFC3-UVIS chips, UVIS1 and UVIS2, were calculated for all 42 full-frame filters, after accounting for temporal changes in the observed count rates with respect to a reference epoch in 2009. We also derived new encircled energy values for a few filters and improved sensitivity ratios for the two WFC3-UVIS chips by correcting for sensitivity changes with time. Updated inverse sensitivity values for the 20 WFC3-UVIS quad filters and for the 15 WF3-IR filters were derived by using the new models for the primary standards and the new Vega reference flux and, in the case of the IR detector, new flat fields. However, these values do not account for any sensitivity changes with time. The new calibration provides a photometric internal precision better than 0.5% for the wide-, medium-, and narrow-band WFC3-UVIS filters, 5% for the quad filters, and 1% for the WFC3-IR filters. As of October 15, 2020, an updated set of photometric keywords are populated in the WFC3 image headers.

Submitted to arXiv on 25 May. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2205.13014v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The Hubble Space Telescope's Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) detectors have received a new photometric calibration based on observations collected between 2009 and 2020. The calibration was performed using four white dwarfs, namely GRW+70~5824, GD~153, GD~71, G191B2B, and a G-type star, P330E. The updated calibrations include recent updates to the primary standard white dwarf models and a new reference flux for Vega. Time-dependent inverse sensitivities were calculated for the two WFC3-UVIS chips, UVIS1 and UVIS2, for all 42 full-frame filters after accounting for temporal changes in the observed count rates with respect to a reference epoch in 2009. New encircled energy values were derived for some filters, while improved sensitivity ratios were obtained by correcting for sensitivity changes over time. The updated inverse sensitivity values were derived using the new models for the primary standards and the new Vega reference flux. In addition, new flat fields were used in the case of the IR detector. The new calibration provides a photometric internal precision better than 0.5% for wide-, medium-, and narrow-band WFC3-UVIS filters, 5% for quad filters, and 1% for WFC3-IR filters. As of October 15th, 2020 an updated set of photometric keywords are populated in the WFC3 image headers providing more accurate information about each image taken with this instrument. The team behind this study includes researchers from Space Telescope Science Institute who contributed to refining this important calibration tool that will help astronomers make more precise measurements of celestial objects observed by Hubble's WFC3 detectors.
Created on 24 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.