Collision Detection Accelerated: An Optimization Perspective
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Detection of collisions between two convex shapes is crucial for physics engines and robot motion planners.
- Traditionally, this problem has been approached as a computational geometry problem using the GJK algorithm.
- In this work, collision detection is viewed as a convex optimization problem.
- The authors establish that the GJK algorithm is a specific sub-case of the Frank-Wolfe (FW) algorithm in convex optimization.
- They introduce a new collision detection algorithm that significantly reduces the number of iterations required to solve collision detection problems compared to the state-of-the-art GJK algorithm.
- The proposed accelerated collision detection method was benchmarked on two datasets composed of strictly convex and non-strictly convex shapes, showing up to two times faster computation times than the GJK algorithm.
- This improvement in speed is attributed to their use of an optimization-based approach that leverages recent advances in Nesterov acceleration and Frank-Wolfe methods.
- This work provides a new perspective on collision detection and offers an alternative approach that can potentially improve performance for various applications such as robotics, gaming engines, and virtual reality simulations.
Authors: Louis Montaut, Quentin Le Lidec, Vladimir Petrik, Josef Sivic, Justin Carpentier
Abstract: Collision detection between two convex shapes is an essential feature of any physics engine or robot motion planner. It has often been tackled as a computational geometry problem, with the Gilbert, Johnson and Keerthi (GJK) algorithm being the most common approach today. In this work we leverage the fact that collision detection is fundamentally a convex optimization problem. In particular, we establish that the GJK algorithm is a specific sub-case of the well-established Frank-Wolfe (FW) algorithm in convex optimization. We introduce a new collision detection algorithm by adapting recent works linking Nesterov acceleration and Frank-Wolfe methods. We benchmark the proposed accelerated collision detection method on two datasets composed of strictly convex and non-strictly convex shapes. Our results show that our approach significantly reduces the number of iterations to solve collision detection problems compared to the state-of-the-art GJK algorithm, leading to up to two times faster computation times.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.