Collision Detection Accelerated: An Optimization Perspective

AI-generated keywords: Collision Detection GJK Algorithm Frank-Wolfe Algorithm Nesterov Acceleration Convex Optimization

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Detection of collisions between two convex shapes is crucial for physics engines and robot motion planners.
  • Traditionally, this problem has been approached as a computational geometry problem using the GJK algorithm.
  • In this work, collision detection is viewed as a convex optimization problem.
  • The authors establish that the GJK algorithm is a specific sub-case of the Frank-Wolfe (FW) algorithm in convex optimization.
  • They introduce a new collision detection algorithm that significantly reduces the number of iterations required to solve collision detection problems compared to the state-of-the-art GJK algorithm.
  • The proposed accelerated collision detection method was benchmarked on two datasets composed of strictly convex and non-strictly convex shapes, showing up to two times faster computation times than the GJK algorithm.
  • This improvement in speed is attributed to their use of an optimization-based approach that leverages recent advances in Nesterov acceleration and Frank-Wolfe methods.
  • This work provides a new perspective on collision detection and offers an alternative approach that can potentially improve performance for various applications such as robotics, gaming engines, and virtual reality simulations.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Louis Montaut, Quentin Le Lidec, Vladimir Petrik, Josef Sivic, Justin Carpentier

Robotics: Science and Systems 2022
RSS 2022, 12 pages, 9 figures, 2 tables
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: Collision detection between two convex shapes is an essential feature of any physics engine or robot motion planner. It has often been tackled as a computational geometry problem, with the Gilbert, Johnson and Keerthi (GJK) algorithm being the most common approach today. In this work we leverage the fact that collision detection is fundamentally a convex optimization problem. In particular, we establish that the GJK algorithm is a specific sub-case of the well-established Frank-Wolfe (FW) algorithm in convex optimization. We introduce a new collision detection algorithm by adapting recent works linking Nesterov acceleration and Frank-Wolfe methods. We benchmark the proposed accelerated collision detection method on two datasets composed of strictly convex and non-strictly convex shapes. Our results show that our approach significantly reduces the number of iterations to solve collision detection problems compared to the state-of-the-art GJK algorithm, leading to up to two times faster computation times.

Submitted to arXiv on 19 May. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2205.09663v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The detection of collisions between two convex shapes is a crucial aspect of any physics engine or robot motion planner. Traditionally, this problem has been approached as a computational geometry problem, with the Gilbert, Johnson and Keerthi (GJK) algorithm being the most commonly used approach today. However, in this work by Louis Montaut et al., collision detection is viewed as a convex optimization problem. The authors establish that the GJK algorithm is a specific sub-case of the Frank-Wolfe (FW) algorithm in convex optimization. By adapting recent works linking Nesterov acceleration and Frank-Wolfe methods, they introduce a new collision detection algorithm that significantly reduces the number of iterations required to solve collision detection problems compared to the state-of-the-art GJK algorithm. The proposed accelerated collision detection method was benchmarked on two datasets composed of strictly convex and non-strictly convex shapes. The results show that their approach leads to up to two times faster computation times than the GJK algorithm. This improvement in speed is attributed to their use of an optimization-based approach that leverages recent advances in Nesterov acceleration and Frank-Wolfe methods. This work provides a new perspective on collision detection and offers an alternative approach that can potentially improve performance for various applications such as robotics, gaming engines, and virtual reality simulations. Overall, this study highlights the importance of considering different perspectives when tackling complex problems like collision detection and demonstrates how insights from one field can be applied to another field for significant improvements in performance.
Created on 28 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.