Classification of anatomic structures in head and neck by CT-based radiomics
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Investigated differences in radiomics features among various anatomical structures in the head and neck area using CT images
- Explored whether CT radiomics could be used to classify anatomical structures using unsupervised machine-learning techniques
- Analyzed treatment planning data from 36 patients with head and neck cancers, totaling 1357 contours of more than 22 anatomical structures
- Calculated 174 radiomics features for each structure using the SIBEX program
- Tested uniqueness of radiomics features for classifying contours into their respective anatomical groups
- Developed a two-stage clustering technique to further classify the 22 anatomical structures into sub-groups with similar characteristics
- Identified distinct differences in heatmap of radiomics features between tumors and healthy structures in head and neck area
- Achieved over 90% accuracy in identifying specific structures such as eyes, lens, submandibular glands, pituitary glands, and thyroids using radiomics features
- Identified six subgroups among the 22 anatomical structures based on shared characteristics such as fatty and bony tissues through clustering technique
- Demonstrated potential of utilizing radiomics features for disease identification and therapy outcome prediction in clinical practice for head and neck tumors
Authors: Yoichi Watanabe, A. Biswas, K. Rangarajan, G. Rath, N. Gopishankar
Abstract: Background and Purpose: Radiomics features are used to identify disease types and predict therapy outcomes. However, how the radiomics features are different among different anatomical structures has never been investigated. Hence, we analyzed the radiomics features of 22 anatomical structures in the head and neck area in CT images. Furthermore, we studied whether CT radiomics can classify anatomical structures of the head and neck using unsupervised machine-learning techniques. Materials and methods: We obtained IMRT/VMAT treatment planning data from 36 patients treated for head and neck cancers in a single institution. There were 1357 contours of more than 22 anatomical structures drawn on planning CTs. We calculated 174 radiomics features using the SIBEX program. First, we tested whether the radiomics features of anatomical structures were unique enough to classify all contours into 22 groups. We then developed a two-stage clustering technique to classify 22 anatomic structures into sub-groups with similar physiological or biological characteristics. Results: The heatmap of 174 radiomics features of 22 anatomical structures showed a distinct difference among tumors and other healthy structures. Radiomics features have allowed us to identify the eyes, lens, submandibular, pituitary glands, and thyroids with over 90% accuracy. The two-stage clustering of 22 structures resulted in six subgroups, which shared common characteristics such as fatty and bony tissues. Conclusions: We have shown that anatomical structures in head and neck tumors have distinguishable radiomics features. We could observe similarities of features among subgroups of the structures. The results suggest that CT radiomics can help distinguish the biological characteristics of head and neck lesions.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.