How Different Groups Prioritize Ethical Values for Responsible AI

AI-generated keywords: Responsible AI Ethical Values US Population Crowdworkers AI Practitioners

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Private companies, public sector organizations, and academic groups have outlined ethical values for responsible AI technologies
  • Little is known about the values that a more representative public would prioritize for AI technologies they interact with
  • A survey was conducted to examine how individuals perceive and prioritize responsible AI values across three groups: US population, crowdworkers, and AI practitioners
  • Results show that AI practitioners' value priorities differ from those of the general public, emphasizing a different set of values
  • Self-identified women and black respondents found responsible AI values more important than other groups
  • Liberal-leaning participants were more likely to prioritize fairness than other groups rather than participants reporting experiences with discrimination
  • There is significant variation in how different groups prioritize ethical values for responsible AI
  • It is crucial to engage diverse stakeholders in discussions around defining responsible AI and ensuring their perspectives are taken into account when developing guidelines and policies for these technologies.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Maurice Jakesch, Zana Buçinca, Saleema Amershi, Alexandra Olteanu

2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '22), June 21-24, 2022, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Abstract: Private companies, public sector organizations, and academic groups have outlined ethical values they consider important for responsible artificial intelligence technologies. While their recommendations converge on a set of central values, little is known about the values a more representative public would find important for the AI technologies they interact with and might be affected by. We conducted a survey examining how individuals perceive and prioritize responsible AI values across three groups: a representative sample of the US population (N=743), a sample of crowdworkers (N=755), and a sample of AI practitioners (N=175). Our results empirically confirm a common concern: AI practitioners' value priorities differ from those of the general public. Compared to the US-representative sample, AI practitioners appear to consider responsible AI values as less important and emphasize a different set of values. In contrast, self-identified women and black respondents found responsible AI values more important than other groups. Surprisingly, more liberal-leaning participants, rather than participants reporting experiences with discrimination, were more likely to prioritize fairness than other groups. Our findings highlight the importance of paying attention to who gets to define responsible AI.

Submitted to arXiv on 16 May. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2205.07722v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In recent years, private companies, public sector organizations and academic groups have outlined ethical values that they consider important for responsible artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. However, little is known about the values that a more representative public would prioritize for the AI technologies they interact with and might be affected by. To address this gap in knowledge, a team of researchers conducted a survey examining how individuals perceive and prioritize responsible AI values across three groups: a representative sample of the US population (N=743), a sample of crowdworkers (N=755), and a sample of AI practitioners (N=175). The results of the study empirically confirm a common concern: AI practitioners' value priorities differ from those of the general public. Specifically, compared to the US-representative sample, AI practitioners appear to consider responsible AI values as less important and emphasize a different set of values. This finding highlights the importance of paying attention to who gets to define responsible AI. Interestingly, self-identified women and black respondents found responsible AI values more important than other groups. Surprisingly, more liberal-leaning participants were also more likely to prioritize fairness than other groups rather than participants reporting experiences with discrimination. Overall, these findings suggest that there is significant variation in how different groups prioritize ethical values for responsible AI. As such, it is crucial to engage diverse stakeholders in discussions around defining responsible AI and ensuring that their perspectives are taken into account when developing guidelines and policies for these technologies.
Created on 26 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.