Classification of Galaxy Cluster Membership with Machine Learning
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors present a classification algorithm using Random Forest machine learning model
- Algorithm differentiates galaxies into three populations: orbiting, infalling, and background
- Phase space information used as input for training and testing
- Algorithm accurately recovers distribution of orbiting and infalling galaxies with less than 1% error
- Probabilistic predictions used in presence of interlopers in projected phase space
- Machine learning-based galaxy classification method measures dynamics of cluster galaxies at percent level accuracy
- Potential applications discussed include improving cluster cosmology and understanding galaxy quenching
- Accurate classification helps gain insights into formation, evolution, and processes involved in galaxy quenching within clusters
Authors: Daniel Farid, Han Aung, Daisuke Nagai, Arya Farahi, Eduardo Rozo
Abstract: We present a classification algorithm based on the Random Forest machine learning model that differentiates galaxies into orbiting, infalling and background (interloper) populations, using phase space information as input. We train and test our model with the galaxies from UniverseMachine mock catalog based on Multi-Dark Planck 2 N-body simulations. We show that we can recover the distribution of orbiting and infalling galaxies in 3D and 2D position and velocity distribution with $<1\%$ error when using probabilistic predictions in the presence of interlopers in the projected phase space. Our machine learning-based galaxy classification method enables a percent level measurements of the dynamics of cluster galaxies. We discuss potential applications of this technique to improve cluster cosmology and galaxy quenching.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.