Classification of Buildings' Potential for Seismic Damage by Means of Artificial Intelligence Techniques

AI-generated keywords: Seismic Damage Machine Learning Earthquake Safety Reinforced Concrete Buildings Maximum Interstory Drift Ratio

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • A reliable method for classifying seismic damage potential of buildings in high seismicity regions is crucial for developing earthquake safety plans
  • Various procedures based on simple calculations or statistical theory have been proposed and some have been adopted by seismic code guidelines
  • Modern statistical methods utilizing machine learning algorithms can predict seismic performance and classify structural damage levels by extracting patterns from data collected through various sources
  • The authors utilized a large training dataset consisting of 90 3D reinforced concrete buildings with three different masonry infills' distributions and analyzed them using Nonlinear Time History Analysis method for 65 real seismic records
  • Machine learning algorithms were employed to estimate each building's damage response, showing that well-established machine learning methods can solve sophisticated real-world problems with high accuracy
  • Machine learning techniques have the potential to accurately predict seismic performance and classify structural damage levels, ultimately helping authorities develop effective earthquake safety plans for highly earthquake-susceptible structures in countries with regions of high seismicity.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Konstantinos Kostinakis, Konstantinos Morfidis, Konstantinos Demertzis, Lazaros Iliadis

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: Developing a rapid, but also reliable and efficient, method for classifying the seismic damage potential of buildings constructed in countries with regions of high seismicity is always at the forefront of modern scientific research. Such a technique would be essential for estimating the pre-seismic vulnerability of the buildings, so that the authorities will be able to develop earthquake safety plans for seismic rehabilitation of the highly earthquake-susceptible structures. In the last decades, several researchers have proposed such procedures, some of which were adopted by seismic code guidelines. These procedures usually utilize methods based either on simple calculations or on the application of statistics theory. Recently, the increase of the computers' power has led to the development of modern statistical methods based on the adoption of Machine Learning algorithms. These methods have been shown to be useful for predicting seismic performance and classifying structural damage level by means of extracting patterns from data collected via various sources. A large training dataset is used for the implementation of the classification algorithms. To this end, 90 3D R/C buildings with three different masonry infills' distributions are analysed utilizing Nonlinear Time History Analysis method for 65 real seismic records. The level of the seismic damage is expressed in terms of the Maximum Interstory Drift Ratio. A large number of Machine Learning algorithms is utilized in order to estimate the buildings' damage response. The most significant conclusion which is extracted is that the Machine Learning methods that are mathematically well-established and their operations that are clearly interpretable step by step can be used to solve some of the most sophisticated real-world problems in consideration with high accuracy.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Apr. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2205.01076v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The development of a rapid and reliable method for classifying the seismic damage potential of buildings in regions with high seismicity is crucial for estimating pre-seismic vulnerability and developing earthquake safety plans. Over the past few decades, researchers have proposed various procedures based on simple calculations or statistical theory, some of which have been adopted by seismic code guidelines. However, recent advancements in computer power have led to the emergence of modern statistical methods that utilize machine learning algorithms to predict seismic performance and classify structural damage levels by extracting patterns from data collected through various sources. In this study, the authors utilized a large training dataset consisting of 90 3D reinforced concrete buildings with three different masonry infills' distributions. They analyzed these structures using Nonlinear Time History Analysis method for 65 real seismic records and expressed the level of seismic damage in terms of Maximum Interstory Drift Ratio. The authors then employed numerous machine learning algorithms to estimate each building's damage response. The results showed that mathematically well-established machine learning methods with clearly interpretable step-by-step operations can solve some of the most sophisticated real-world problems with high accuracy. This finding highlights the potential usefulness of machine learning techniques in predicting seismic performance and classifying structural damage levels accurately. The study's findings could help authorities develop effective earthquake safety plans for highly earthquake-susceptible structures in countries with regions of high seismicity, ultimately saving lives and minimizing property damage during earthquakes.
Created on 28 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.