Observation of large scale precursor correlations between cosmic rays and earthquakes

AI-generated keywords: Cosmic Rays Seismic Activity Solar Cycle Early Warning System Correlation

AI-generated Key Points

  • Scientists have been researching early warning systems for earthquakes by studying correlations between cosmic ray detection rates and seismic activity.
  • A recent study found a significant correlation between the average variation of cosmic ray detection rates and global seismic activity with a time lag of approximately two weeks.
  • The correlation varied with a periodicity resembling the undecenal solar cycle, with a shift in phase of around three years.
  • At local maxima, the correlation exceeded 6 sigma, indicating strong statistical significance.
  • These precursor characteristics suggest that these correlations could be used to create an effective early warning system for earthquakes.
  • The study involved collaboration among numerous authors from different institutions and disciplines, including data visualization experts and project administrators.
  • All data used in this study are publicly available in cited databases.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: P. Homola, V. Marchenko, A. Napolitano, R. Damian, R. Guzik, D. Alvarez-Castillo, S. Stuglik, O. Ruimi, O. Skorenok, J. Zamora-Saa, J. M. Vaquero, T. Wibig, M. Knap, K. Dziadkowiec, M. Karpiel, O. Sushchov, J. W. Mietelski, K. Gorzkiewicz, N. Zabari, K. Almeida Cheminant, B. Idźkowski, T. Bulik, G. Bhatta, N. Budnev, R. Kamiński, M. V. Medvedev, K. Kozak, O. Bar, Ł. Bibrzycki, M. Bielewicz, M. Frontczak, P. Kovács, B. Łozowski, J. Miszczyk, M. Niedźwiecki, L. del Peral, M. Piekarczyk, M. D. Rodriguez Frias, K. Rzecki, K. Smelcerz, T. Sośnicki, J. Stasielak, A. A. Tursunov

Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Vol. 247, 106068 (2023)
arXiv: 2204.12310v1 - DOI (physics.geo-ph)
16 pages, 4 figures in the main article and 11 pages and 4 figures in the Suplementary Material
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: The search for correlations between secondary cosmic ray detection rates and seismic effects has long been a subject of investigation motivated by the hope of identifying a new precursor type that could feed a global early warning system against earthquakes. Here we show for the first time that the average variation of the cosmic ray detection rates correlates with the global seismic activity to be observed with a time lag of approximately two weeks, and that the significance of the effect varies with a periodicity resembling the undecenal solar cycle, with a shift in phase of around three years, exceeding 6 sigma at local maxima. The precursor characteristics of the observed correlations point to a pioneer perspective of an early warning system against earthquakes.

Submitted to arXiv on 26 Apr. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2204.12310v1

Scientists have long sought to develop early warning systems against earthquakes by investigating correlations between secondary cosmic ray detection rates and seismic activity. A recent study observed a significant correlation between the average variation of cosmic ray detection rates and global seismic activity with a time lag of approximately two weeks. This correlation was found to vary with a periodicity resembling the undecenal solar cycle, with a shift in phase of around three years. At local maxima, the correlation exceeded 6 sigma, indicating strong statistical significance. These precursor characteristics suggest that these correlations could be used to create an effective early warning system for earthquakes. The study was conducted through collaboration among numerous authors from different institutions and disciplines, including data visualization experts and project administrators. All data used in this study are publicly available in cited databases.
Created on 17 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.