Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
AI-generated Key Points
- The article discusses the use of preference modeling and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) to improve language models as helpful assistants.
- Alignment training using RLHF improves performance on almost all natural language processing evaluations, including specialized skills like python coding and summarization.
- An iterated online mode of training is explored where preference models and RL policies are updated weekly with fresh human feedback data, efficiently improving datasets and models.
- The robustness of RLHF training is investigated, identifying a roughly linear relation between the RL reward and the square root of the KL divergence between the policy and its initialization.
- Peripheral analyses are performed on calibration, competing objectives, and the use of OOD detection.
- Large preference models trained on a mixture of human-human (HH) and learning-to-summarize (LtS) datasets perform equally well on both.
- RLHF decreases the performance of small code models but improves larger ones when combined with natural language alignment for coding tasks.
- Improvements in performance from RLHF are modest in all evaluations but valuable for finetuning language models for specialized skills like coding or summarization.
- Simply prompting a base code model performs slightly better than using RLHF alone.
- Sam Ge is thanked for his contributions to this research.
Authors: Yuntao Bai, Andy Jones, Kamal Ndousse, Amanda Askell, Anna Chen, Nova DasSarma, Dawn Drain, Stanislav Fort, Deep Ganguli, Tom Henighan, Nicholas Joseph, Saurav Kadavath, Jackson Kernion, Tom Conerly, Sheer El-Showk, Nelson Elhage, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Danny Hernandez, Tristan Hume, Scott Johnston, Shauna Kravec, Liane Lovitt, Neel Nanda, Catherine Olsson, Dario Amodei, Tom Brown, Jack Clark, Sam McCandlish, Chris Olah, Ben Mann, Jared Kaplan
Abstract: We apply preference modeling and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) to finetune language models to act as helpful and harmless assistants. We find this alignment training improves performance on almost all NLP evaluations, and is fully compatible with training for specialized skills such as python coding and summarization. We explore an iterated online mode of training, where preference models and RL policies are updated on a weekly cadence with fresh human feedback data, efficiently improving our datasets and models. Finally, we investigate the robustness of RLHF training, and identify a roughly linear relation between the RL reward and the square root of the KL divergence between the policy and its initialization. Alongside our main results, we perform peripheral analyses on calibration, competing objectives, and the use of OOD detection, compare our models with human writers, and provide samples from our models using prompts appearing in recent related work.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.