Heterogeneous Acceleration Pipeline for Recommendation System Training
Authors: Muhammad Adnan, Yassaman Ebrahimzadeh Maboud, Divya Mahajan, Prashant J. Nair
Abstract: Recommendation systems are unique as they show a conflation of compute and memory intensity due to their deep learning and massive embedding tables. Training these models typically involve a hybrid CPU-GPU mode, where GPUs accelerate the deep learning portion and the CPUs store and process the memory-intensive embedding tables. The hybrid mode incurs a substantial CPU-to-GPU transfer time and relies on main memory bandwidth to feed embeddings to GPU for deep learning acceleration. Alternatively, we can store the entire embeddings across GPUs to avoid the transfer time and utilize the GPU's High Bandwidth Memory (HBM). This approach requires GPU-to-GPU backend communication and scales the number of GPUs with the size of the embedding tables. To overcome these concerns, this paper offers a heterogeneous acceleration pipeline, called Hotline. Hotline leverages the insight that only a small number of embedding entries are accessed frequently, and can easily fit in a single GPU's HBM. Hotline implements a data-aware and model-aware scheduling pipeline that utilizes the (1) CPU main memory for not-frequently-accessed embeddings and (2) GPUs' local memory for frequently-accessed embeddings. Hotline improves the training throughput by dynamically stitching the execution of popular and not-popular inputs through a novel hardware accelerator and feeding to the GPUs. Results on real-world datasets and recommender models show that Hotline reduces the average training time by 3x and 1.8x in comparison to Intel-optimized CPU-GPU DLRM and HugeCTR-optimized GPU-only baseline, respectively. Hotline increases the overall training throughput to 35.7 epochs/hour in comparison to 5.3 epochs/hour for the Intel-optimized DLRM baseline
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Some bits of the article are not summarized yet, you can re-run the summarizing process by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.